zombiejunkie
zombiejunkie
zombiejunkie

Sometimes it’s work videos between home and the office (uneditted footage is not a freaking joke), or 4K porn (about what 10 gigs for 20 mins each clip), or the latest blockbuster REMUX (35 gigs per movie) - it really adds up, really quickly. Netflix, gaming and other things like that don’t really count for much -

Try real hard? I don’t have to try at all. I go over several TBs in any given month.

“Report: A Body Has Been Found at Apple Headquarters”

An alternate headline for this piece is “AMC Cedes Only Advantage Theaters Have Over a Good Home Theater System.”

I agree with your interpretation of everything except that I would argue that this wasn’t a “stand your ground” issue. She was legally covered under FL statute 776.012 (2) defending another to prevent great bodily harm or a forcible felony.

This isn’t a “stand your ground” issue. The woman wasn’t being attacked.

Yeah that’s one interpretation. I tend to agree with Sean MacDonald’s interpretation;

how did the driver assault the rider?

He absolutely should have stayed in his car, he also shouldn’t have driven recklessly in pursuit. But then again, the asshats on the bikes should have driven like maniacs and accosted his vehicle.

Just a note. Zimmerman/Martin was NOT a stand your ground case despite all the talk. If it had been, it NEVER WOULD HAVE GONE TO TRIAL!

Yes. If the engaging party didn’t create a reasonable fear for one’s life, and the engaged party do subsequent to engagement, then yes. Reasonable force is justified. He wasn’t throwing punches or threatening them. By surrounding him, punching him, a reasonable fear of death or severe injury was created and the third

Make no mistake about it, The BMW driver was in mortal peril by three men in body armour giving him a beatdown. Anyone with a handgun in the vicinity would have had the legal right to shoot them even without them approaching the person holding the gun, or threatening them in any way. No jury in Florida would convict

That didn’t take long. All hail the Lord and Savior of victimhood, Trayvon. He dindu nuffin.

Well said sir.

“Stand your ground” laws are widely misunderstood. They aren’t some license to kill. All they mean is that your right to self-defense isn’t abridged by a duty to retreat. They place the burden on your attacker, which is exactly where it belongs.

intentionally engages others

Just a reminder folks; you may be a tough mofo but people can and do legally carry guns and a gun is the ultimate equalizer. Looks like this was Florida and that’s a will issue state* and a stand your ground state**. Had one of those riders turned towards her threateningly she could have legally shot and killed him

This has to top the “Best sports stories written by women in 2016"

...he’ll be here all week, folks. ;)

Yup