Rep. Duncan Hunter of California intended it as “gotcha amendment,” because he didn’t think liberals would vote to draft women.

But technically—-they werent. they were not swimming- they were barely up to their ankles.

Sticking your feet in water is not swimming.

I disagree. That title should not be touched. She had a late term abortion. Period. When I read the headline, I felt an emotional pull towards this article, and I knew I was in for a bit of an emotional read. You see, women don’t get abortions because it’s the easy way out, or because they’re sluts, or because they…

It was a late term abortion. The baby’s heart was stopped and it was extracted. What was misleading?

My first instinct was to comment that as far I’m concerned, this was a miscarriage and not an abortion. But then I decided that insisting it’s not abortion further stigmatizes late term abortion. It’s rare for late term abortions to be performed for reasons other than health risks/nonviability and to refuse to use…

Yeesh. That’s a completely factual headline that you’ve chosen to see as loaded and misleading.

Why were you horrified by the title?

The point of the article is to explain that the choice is a personal one that should be left up to the woman and it is not our place to judge the “reasons”. Judging a woman’s reasons for an abortion are exactly what put her in the predicament of having to fly to Colorado and spend $10k on a shot.