From what I hear, there were lots of trans roles in this script. All but the lead was going to be a trans actor. It was going to hire more trans actors than any movie in history. Now, it’s dead.

Trying to shame her for these things is ludicrous.

That’s Chloe in your cover photo, not Halle.

Steam versus Epic is a Alien versus Predator scenario.

I’ll note, as a declaration of bias, that I don’t exactly believe him. The revenue split was a great PR win for his company, but I just don’t buy that his main focus is on giving developers a better revenue split.

It makes sense in the way of getting rich any way you can. Steam has an objectively better product than them, and they are asking costumers to lower their standards in order to let them brute-force into the market.

The fact that he is worth $7 billion is exactly why I personally give his explanation some side-eye. He has painted a picture where the decision is about improving the market for everyone and no about making money, but you don’t become a billion dollar businessman by being altruistic, you do it by gaming the system to…

He’s singling out Steam users as the ones that are unhappy with exclusives. Who the fuck is ever actually happy with exclusives? That’s such a bullshit way to attempt a jab at Steam while also assuming every other game as being okay with exclusives.

Because he’s positioning himself as altruistic. You can call it cynical and shit, but when a CEO tells you “I’m doing this thing because it’s going to make things better for everyone”, you start looking for the razor in the candy floss.

Seem that y’all aren’t interested in any comments today.

So we can just take every bit of information thrown at us and not consider the implications of how its being reported or how people may come to conclusions based on the method? Or even who this may be targeting or whether or not a different picture is being drawn here?

But what is the point of dedicating the entire post to the fact that the MNT players refused to or failed to comment? Clearly, Ms. McKinney is suggesting, and not particularly subtly, what people should do with that fact—we should conclude that these male players condone or are are complicit in the disparate…

Its also a fact they’re not obligated to respond. No one is, especially when they are unsure of how they’re response may be reported.

They put out a press release supporting them in their fight...

I’d argue that posting the lack of responses (which is also lacking in some context) in the manner the author did is a rather passive-aggressive criticism.

The United States National Soccer Team Players Association fully supports the efforts of the US Women’s National Team Players to achieve equal pay. Specifically, we are committed to the concept of a revenue-sharing model to address the US Soccer Federation’s “market realities” and find a way towards fair compensation.…

Here is their collective statement regarding the matter:

I agree with the disdain for the pay inequality, but — speaking as a former market reporter — this seems like a terrible way to go about this without more information, such as how long they were given to respond. Also, they really are in a tournament right now, and their employer is being sued.

It seems like you might not know, but it’s a pretty common practice not to comment on the matters of a pending lawsuit, whether you are directly or indirectly involved.

“We are committed to the concept of a revenue-sharing model to address the US Soccer Federation’s ‘market realities’ and find a way towards fair compensation,” read a statement issued by the union. “An equal division of revenue attributable to the MNT and WNT programs is our primary pursuit as we engage with the US…