zephyr_haversack
zephyr_haversack
zephyr_haversack

Well I think it would become a problem for doctors, it would basically be like adderall where everyone and their mother is trying to get a script. Because steroids.

Doctors who are too freaked out by the idea of women having more testosterone, I think. Girls are “not supposed to have boy hormones”. They might grow beards, or something. Nevermind that the levels are so low to get me to “women’s normal” that it would never cause that.

There is a really easy drug to fix this available today - low dose testosterone. Women have it naturally in their bodies anyway, and it does have an effect on libido. When I was tested my testostrone level was WAY low, almost non-existent. I was given a low-dose cream, and my libido jumped right up to normal as soon

Viagra isn’t an arousal drug though; it only increases blood flow to the area... And it’s taken before the man wants to perform his sad little act.

Women over 40 don’t want to have sex? Every time I hear that chestnut the only thing I think of is “with you”.

Yes and no. There are a ton of reasons for low libido (sex drive). Common ones include: you naturally have a low libido, you have stress/anxiety/mental stuff to work out, or drug interactions. These are common in men and women. Viagra doesn’t treat low libido. It treats a non-functioning penis of a guy who really

Thank you. Comparing “libido” with the mechanics of sex isn’t the same thing.

Can we please state for the millionth time that a drug to treat low libido is not a female Viagra? Viagra only facilitates blood flow to the penis following arousal. A female counterpart would be an estrogen suppository that aids post menopausal women with vaginal dryness. There is no approved and effective drug to

This is a false equivalency. Viagra doesn’t provide “libido.” It gives people with the interest in having sex the mechanical ability to have sex. IE “Man, I really want to have sex, but my penis doesn’t work.” Not, I really wish I felt like having sex.

I’m really torn up about this. On the one hand, policing a young woman’s body like this feels awful, just imagine what Kiki Willems has to go through reading all these comments, and the way the ASA is picking apart her body. On the other hand, something needs to be done about fashion’s obsession with super skinny

You are SO RIGHT. This image is terrifying. It is horrible.

Skeletons should not be models.

I have cookie crumbs on my boobs for slothfulness awareness. Really though, just found out I have a brca 1 mutation, it’s pretty scary. This “helpful” reminder is really bugging me for some reason. How about we solve the whole cancer problem, THEN people can go around making us all aware of the progress. You know,

From the looks of those boobs very few are "The Real Thing."

when that part of the male anatomy is aroused and there’s an erection, the brain flies out of that and we have to take that very seriously,

I agree with her in the sense that it is a stupid move to get naked with someone in bed and not wanting to have sex with them (unless you stipulated this previously). That said, I also believe you have the ability to say no at any point and I will respect that decision by stopping or not starting (whatever the

Dr Ruth????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This saddens me so much.

What the fuck did I just watch?

I love the deep discomfort with which this article and we in general treat an earnest statement by a comedian.