zenspath
zenspath
zenspath

Apparently you aren't very bright, especially given example I laid forth. So here...let me try this again. We have multiple copies of the game because we will all play the game on the Wii U as we do now with the previous titles (that is 1...can you keep count...no?, it's ok...I'll do the heavy lifting for you..just

I would be fine if they had maps, character SKINS, and such as DLC for later...could add in some little references and fan favorites as needed...but I still feel the actual playable characters should be unlockable in game. No game in a series has carried over EVERY character for one reason or another. Simply cut,

Both versions have Amiibo support, it just has to have the adapter released for 3DS. And I am pretty sure they could fit more on there for a story mode and just skip the memory eating CGI moments. I mean we can get games with 80+ hours of gameplay, large worlds, full voice acting, some CGI, and more all on a normal

They have shown the single player, at least for the 3DS version...it just doesn't have some big crazy story trying to connect it all together with some FMVs tossed in here or there. It is more like the Find Mii adventure on 3DS where you choose your path/fights as you go through it as a challenge to unlock additional

They have already shown a larger roster than any previous Smash made as well as tons of features, music, trophies, assist trophies, etc lol. They took their time and I think we will benefit from that. Would have been worse to rush it out than to wait and finish it.

Agreed. The characters are fine..it is just the DLC idea that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Heck, would they even be cross-purchaseable or would I have to buy each character TWICE just to keep up between the versions...and then I would have to buy them 3 more times each for the other copies in my house. ONE DLC

Well, this "kid" is more than likely older than you..but that is beside the point. An expansion pack is something that is created later and either adds more content in lieu of a full sequel or is a side story. But this is a fighting game that can, and has, seen professional level competition as well as succeeding as

I'm ok with the odd characters and what not...that has been something Smash Bros has been doing since day one which can keep things hilarious.

Published March 31st, could have been written before then. And even if that is the case, a week or two is enough time to start a relationship with someone after meeting. There isn't some magic set amount of time to talk, etc before you can start. As for the "fucking not dating" part...not everyone does it in that

There is years of proof I was together with my wife YEARS before we actually started dating and got married. Just because you are with someone and interact with them DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE IN A RELATIONSHIP. At some point they BOTH had to decide that they wanted that relationship, and once that was done no other

Then no one should ever write about, talk about, or have anything to do with someone JUST IN CASE they may have relationship later? And if Stephen believes it enough to make the call and stand behind him...we should respect that. We are here to comment about gaming news...not run Kotaku and try to make their

Me and my wife "met" in highschool..yet we didn't really "meet" until years later when we happened to work together. Does that make us liars? No one knows how they will meet the people they date...to expect that everyone you meet has to be sanitary and scrubbed is ridiculous and honestly unreal of an expectation. He

Agreed. Everything looks above board and I appreciate the clarity of the situation and the seriousness of it being handled. But honestly, the guy wrote an article BEFORE they were together...and nothing since they did. It is their personal lives and should be left along. They have clearly kept that part of their

News Story: Wii U owners won't buy purposely broken games after developer goes out of their way to let them know they are screwing them over. Ubisoft excited their excuse is working to not do their jobs. Wonders why no one buys games months later, missing parts, and for more money while giving excuses and expecting

Much of that was fixed with updates (I played it before I could download the update so I got to see both versions) and IV runs great now...but they still poisoned their own water by announcing no DLC ahead of time.

I enjoyed them, but I also agree with the "bargain basement ports" part of his statement. These devs go out of their way to remove content, features, and point out MONTHS in advance of a game that it will be coming later and/or missing content and then wonder why people don't wait for their self proclaimed worse

I got Assassins Creed 3 and 4 on my Wii U and have enjoyed the titles and used the gamepad for a better experience in the game along with enjoying the off screen play when I want. But of course they decide to just skip the version that would benefit from it with Rogue. I won't buy it if it doesn't come to Wii

Who's fault is that if they purposely make sub-par versions, and then go out of their way to point this out before the game comes out? Hey, come buy Assassins Creed IV, but we are already not going to make the DLC available for it! And then they wonder why people listened to them and got a different version and act

I would rather them actually do something different and daring to mix up gaming rather than just "another" system that does the same things. You can get by with most game with either a PS4, X1, or PC...but without a Wii U you miss out on many original titles as well as unique features on existing games. I'll take

That game brings back so many memories. It's the one and only game that got both my Dad and Grandfather playing games...and making me wait when they took over the day I got it as a kid lol.