The article is short but worth a read. It discusses how patriarchy, bruised egos and male entitlement contribute to the male mass killers in North America. The comments quickly devolved to #notallmen MRA male tears mess. I mean, basically, the comments proved out part of the article’s thesis.

I didn’t see this as treating men like bumbling idiots. My Dad was faced with 4 kids, the youngest of whom was under 2 years old. Why, yes, he felt at a loss. Why, yes, he did the very best he could. And let me tell you that if you think childcare is difficult now, try doing doing it in 1963 while still having to be…

I think he definitely needs treatment! But it needs to be cognitive behavioral therapy so that he can learn to actually empathize with others and take responsibility for his own actions. “Sin” and “temptation” are not to blame for him molesting those little girls or for his extramarital affairs: only he is to blame…

Someone asked me if I thought he really had a sex addiction, and I said, “no...I think he’s a human.”

You’ve already tried what I would recommend. Get lazy. Get as lazy as you can, and see if he picks up the slack. Hopefully, the Xanax should help.

How many people do baseballs kill a year? Stop trying to validate a moronic position. No practical use for guns, at all. They offer nothing to society except destruction. If that guy didn’t have a .38, it wouldn’t have happened. Period.

First, you’re not wrong at all about how we treat mental health in this country.

i am having trouble starring this three million times

Yup. Your ass is better off single than shackled to some man-baby who needs you to wipe their ass for them. Heteronormative society telling you otherwise is 100% bullshit.

Except for the part where, if the mentally ill person can only get their hands on a club, there’s a better chance of disarming them and keeping them from killing multiple people.

Term life insurance is your friend!

Yes, far better than I’m capable of, frankly.

I don’t know what everyone else thinks, but the people who wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights are smarter than 99.9999999999999% of the people who have ever lived.

Yeah, and that made sense in 1789, when the strongest a military could be is an army of a few thousand men, unarmored, firing slow-loading muskets that had terrible aim. There were no automatic weapons, or planes, or bombs, or rockets, or grenades, or tanks, or night-vision goggles, or nuclear weapons. It also made…

YES.

That’s a dumb argument now-a-days. When the Bill of Rights was written, it was possible for a populace to fight back against the government when the government only had muskets and cannons.

It depends on what you mean by “smart”. They were certainly gifted thinkers but they were also unmistakably men of their time. Just about any modern Med school student probably knows more than the smartest Doctor of the 18th century about curing disease. Likewise, we know a ton of shit about governing that they…

Try armed rebellion in 2015 and see how long that shit lasts. The U.S. government would turn even a well-armed militia into Swiss cheese before Joe Blow’s first shell casing hit the ground. This argument is pathetically weak.

Ban all guns. Make them illegal to posses. Getting caught with one is an automatic jail sentence. This nonsense has gone on for too long. This amendment was authored by people who were okay with slavery. It does not, and should not, translate to 2015 America