This is incorrect, she’s cool and her combat ability is awesome.

I’m going with H’aanit mostly because I love beast master-type characters and I’m sure I’ll always want her in my party. Primrose’s story is the most interesting to me so far, though.

It’s great that works for you.  Now, imagine that every morning, when you wake up and look between your legs, what you see is *wrong*.  Whatever genitals you expect are not there.  And that feeling doesn’t go away; whatever you expect, it’s always wrong, as though you had a third arm.  What do you do about that?

And why do you think they would be drawn naked in a bath? For what purpose does that illustration serve?

Come on now, surely you don’t actually think that just because they don’t objectify men in this particular game, they’re /never/ objectified.

What, you’ve never looked at a character and thought to yourself, “I want to BE them.” ?

And I’ll bet that if I handed you a 3D printer or a scrollsaw you’d have no idea what you’re doing. I’ve spent $1000+ on just consumable supplies to make a single outfit, and none of that is going to get re-used in the future. I’ve spent way more than that on tools. I’m still not going to charge people money to take…

Well, it could corrupt your save data (which would cause the game to erase it on next boot), but it couldn’t actually damage the cart. Those SNES carts were called “ROM” for a reason, after all.

> The problem with BD is the complete crime against gaming and insult to the players it implements to get the true ending. Such a terrible decision that made me stop playing.

A “service” that they are doing as a hobby, for fun — and virtually all of them will insist on retaining copyright on their photos and will gladly use their photos of me (and other cosplayers) as promotional material for themselves, so actually, if my armor looks good, I *am* doing them a service.

For what it’s worth, as somebody who cosplays pretty regularly, I think it’s ridiculous for amateur photographers to be charging people to take their photos at conventions. It’s gotten pretty bad over the last couple of years, and it didn’t used to be this way.

Kissing? Please, Utawarerumono beat that back in 2002. Nintendo is decades behind.

You’re almost a day late and apparently didn’t read the rest of this thread before commenting, so that’s disappointing.

If you’ve got your own storefront, then that’s fine, you’re welcome to do that.

The problem is, how do you draw the line, and who draws it?

The difference is mostly semantic, since Steam is responsible for the vast majority of digital PC game sales, and games that aren’t available on Steam can only expect to sell a small fraction of what they would otherwise.

Why *should* it be Valve’s responsibility to decide what people are not allowed to play?

What school are you even talking about? Did you get lost and reply to the wrong comment?

That’s so sad. I can’t believe somebody would do something because it has personal meaning to them regardless of whether you personally find it appealing or not.

Have you considered skipping the poor decision of posting bad opinions online?