The robot malfunctioned and didn’t animate correctly. The robot is supposed to release from the tether and tuck into a ball, much like a human would. When it works properly, it’s pretty realistic looking, but obviously here something in the sequence screwed up.

That wasn’t Disneyland California. That was Disney’s California Adventure park.  I know it’s silly but I really hate that everyone just calls them all Disneyland.  They are different parks(that they are gonna charge you more money to go too)

Next you’re going to tell us Santa Claus isn’t real.

I got it today after finally managing to wrap my noggin around the fact that I liek the franchise and it’s stupid to expect TOTES NEW stuff every game. I don’t expect Halloween or Nightmare on Elm St. or Friday to change the formula, just shift it enough to be engaging. That’s where I’m at with Far Cry/AC/honestly…

Kind of a similar case involving Trader Joes a few years back. http://loweringthebar.net/2013/08/trader-joes-suing.html

The jury would have to be full of drooling idiots to imagine that Krispy Kreme is in any way liable for resold products purchased from a 3rd party.

This is pretty hilarious. But Krispy Kremes are really pretty bad.

Soo why does the company feel they have the authority to drop a cease and desist? Their legal authority involves their IP and their point of sale. Nothing of after the fact. I guess they feel that they are missing a premium of some sort here?
No clue at all. Lawyer up there buddy and take it to em for lost wadges for…

he does exactly what grubhub , uber eats does but with one type of food/store only . he was taking orders from the start . whom ever owns the store he was buying from should be pissed as well , losing that big of an order .

No one is getting sick from a sugar and fat product who would not get sick from any similar item. Those people would not touch a donut. If he tainted the donut it would have to be with some material that isn’t found in a donut shop; the last time any such thing happened it was a guy trying to cover an attempted murder…

Probably. The store manager could deny all day of knowing what he was doing with the donuts as long as there was not traceable record. For all she knew, he worked in a big office that bought employees donuts every day.

So they don’t want people’s money? Like? What? Corporations are stupid.

exploiting a hole in their doughnut

…there might be some “work-arounds”

“exploiting a hole in their doughnut”

Plenty of small businesses resell Costco’s muffins. Quick, someone think of the children and put an end to this!

Dude people sell food they make all the time without licensing. Ever heard of a bake sale? 

Looks he was exploiting a hole in their doughnut sales policy. Although it looks to me that Jayson’s free to do as he pleases with his purchase. Re-selling pastries doesn’t seem uncommon at all.

Free market?

It’s just a doughnut.  And I say that to both the eaters and the company that makes it.