:*(

Short and still determinedly wrong, but that’s enough interaction for me.

That’s a lot of words for figuring out that my comment was correct and the last Veep to run and win was in the 80s, and he only served one term. Given that the watchword for villain in politics since Gingrich’s “Republican Revolution” has been “establishment,” — now even picked up by young progressives as a term of…

Google is turning up nothing but “he made it to the shortlist” articles. Do you have a link?

The last time a Veep won the Presidency was in the 80s, and he only served one term. That conventional wisdom is pretty outdated.

Which Castro?

she’s not concerned about the white male demographic - white males haven’t voted democratic since 1964.

Even just purpling up the way they have been is very good for the party. Makes the GOP have to spend there, and if there’s a good enough not-GOP base they can’t keep setting the bar for candidates to crazier new lows.

Castro is my pick too. She has the Latino vote locked all the way down because Trump is a maniac. But she’s enough of a political creature to understand the benefits of locking it down for a generation with a smart and strategic VP/future President. Plus it wouldn’t be pulling anyone from Congress.

No. I think Calvin Harris is a mildly irritating persona with a fake job, but he is doing the underwear model thing admirably.

Yep, you either threaten to rape every feminazi who escapes the kitchen or you’re a white knight. Your comments are so alpha, wow!

I’m famous!

Last night is up there, but I’m sure the happiest I’ve ever been for a sporting outcome when I didn’t have a horse in the race has not been in a sport I actually follow. I am not a Cavs fan, but I have opinions about most of the people on the court and feel invested even when it’s not my team playing. The Olympics are…

+1

The fact that the ACLU is challenging the procedure means that they don’t think it satisfies due process. It doesn’t mean that it doesn’t satisfy due process. The court will determine that. And if the court finds that it doesn’t, it will be rewritten. Also, at the risk of inviting more idiotic drivel, habeas, the…

You do not understand the Constitution. You don’t understand what the term “due process” means, how it is defined, or by whom. You do have a set on you, to address literally zero substantive points and accuse your interlocutor of “ducking,” but I’m really not interested in mocking you anymore. Have fun hiding from the…

You seem genuinely unhinged. What you don’t seem to understand is that yes, the court determines whether a given set of procedures satisfies due process. I’m sorry that makes you so shouty. But your screeds and word association jibbering don’t change the fundamental structure of our government. Maybe go back to…

Likewise!

Yes! They’re flying hamsters who eat mosquitoes — what could be cuter? Everyone I tell I bought a bat house basically acts like I’m a Halloween enthusiast run amok. But I, personally, am the mosquito’s #1 favorite food source, and I want kids in the next couple of years, so I need the bats to start roosting by then.

I hope you’re not joking, because I’m putting mine up this weekend. (I opted for the single chamber because the triple seemed like overkill.)