Not a fan of this costume.
Not a fan of this costume.
I wish I could have gotten into this game. I have a couple of middling-level characters and that’s it.
Not 100% sure I understand the coffee table analogy, because you’re damn right a hard coffee table is more comfortable to sit on when you put a pillow under your butt.
“You’re gonna risk millions of dollars over “recreational habits”?”
“in miserable weather in KC”
“Bernie Sanders Can’t Save Black People”
Are we distinguishing between just amp vs. amp + DAC? There’s a material difference in price and functionality between the two.
“she isn’t so much voicing her opinion as she is forcing it on others.”
When you do the Bears, no shit in there about how their offensive suck isn’t due to Cutler. I can’t explain how sick I am about people making excuses for him every. fucking. year.
I’m a Prime member, and, for example, Madden 16 is showing $59.96 for me? (PS4)
I’m a Prime member, and, for example, Madden 16 is showing $59.96 for me? (PS4)
GMail archiving is something I need a basic primer on. Do those messages count against my cap? Are they searchable? Is it just that they are out of my inbox, or something more? I tried Inbox early on but just couldn’t seem to make it a more efficient way to handle e-mail than the standard app.
The text of the dad’s blog post explicitly says it’s about more than spaghetti straps for him:
You don’t know whether Milo does plaintiffs or defense work, and either way I certainly don’t know that practicing in the area of education civil rights would give that person special insight into gender binaries unless those were the cases they specialized in within the larger area of education civil rights. And even…
You’ve lost the forest for the trees by going into the minutae of the language. The right way to go is from the policy level down, focusing on what is necessary for functionality and safety (no flip-flops) and distinguishing between the ridiculous distractions such as someone wearing pajamas to school vs. the…
If I granted the fact the how I wrote my initial post could have been clearer that I was intending the legal example of disparate impact to be illustrative of how gender neutral language could still be sexist rather than claiming that this district was engaged in actionable discrimination under disparate impact…
The glut hasn’t really cleared, but there are jobs to be reasonably found if your expectations are in line with your graduating credentials. If you go to a good school and get good grades you can get placed into a financially sound position at a large law firm that will completely eat your life and your soul prior to…
Maybe you could point to the specific place I said this was a claimable case of unlawful discrimination in a court of law rather than a legal concept illustrating how a policy written in a gender-neutral way could still be sexist.
Wow, make-up restrictions are gender neutral? Well then that *couldn’t possibly* be disparate impact because they didn’t actually say “Make-up restrictions for girls”! Silly me! Wait . . .
“It is age-neutral but it’s also gender-neutral - which is a thing that I really appreciate.”
Yesh, I hope there aren’t 5. Your opinions sound really awful.