youngwonton
youngwonton
youngwonton

I know, it's like the guy thinks he's Martin Luther King or something.

Hello, Chien-Po!

Calling what Helena Bonham Carter does "singing" is a bit of a stretch.

Wait, is this founded in reality or just a joke?

Yeah, most people don't have access to that Alamo experience. I've driven all around my area in search of a decent theater, and outside of a couple arthouses that only show indies, the closest premium mainstream theater experience like that is the ArcLight in Chicago, an hour and change away.

If by "known for" you mean they did that once, then yeah, I guess they're knowing for ending support to their consoles after 4 years (2012-2016 for the Wii U).

Jordan Vogt-Roberts is in a class above Trevorrow and Webb, IMO. Dude seems to genuinely love cinema and it shows in his work, which I can't say for the other two, although I really like Safety Not Guaranteed.
Really excited for Vogt-Roberts's career. And based on his interviews he also seems like a genuinely likable,

He's already said he has no interest in direction a huge franchise movie. He knows the next 3-4 movies he wants to make. For me, he most likely joins the ranks of Scorsese, Fincher, Tarantino, and P.T. Anderson - (assuming Get Out wasn't a fluke) directors who consistently deliver original and captivating work and

They're jokes.

This is a load of barnacles.

Chuck Lorre's got some dirt on Jon Favreau, huh.

"Ultimately the specifics of the case don't matter once you're dealing with celebrities: You either portray yourself positvely, or you don't."

You're assuming Leslie Jones has no agency in those jokes though. She's a writer as well.

I couldn't tell if it was mic technique problems or a bad mix, but it was definitely heavy on the sibilance.

I wasn't sincerely suggesting we measure the merits of whether you are a better person or not. My whole point was how easy it is to hide behind internet anonymity and cast aspersions against celebrities in an attempt to feel better about yourself.

It's amazing how much you seem to know about these two people you've never met, and how you're clearly a much better person than them, anonymous internet denizen.

Yes, clearly this one Sun-Times article has enough information for complete strangers to make themselves moral arbiters regarding the always messy, two-sides-to-the-story custody battle/child support proceedings.

I saw it, but i imagine it feels the same as not seeing it.

You guys know the comments section at the bottom of articles is linking to the wrong article, right?

The title is obvious, isn't it?