You also gotta press for ramen and other soups.

Sorry?

Good thing you're focusing your amazing intellect on the important things in life, like your goddamned touch ID habits. Go fucking throw yourself into a pool full of Ebola now.

I'll just leave this here.

I can only speak for myself here — and you saw the girl, I didn't — but for some of us, the cursing and moaning in pain and getting super emotionally worked up during a hard workout is part of the fun. It's like rough sex. It's one of the rare places you can healthily get out all that animalistic energy.

Exactly.

As if any more proof was needed of your complete inability to engage with people outside of stereotypes.

You based an argument-by-analogy on something that wasn't even true. As a result, the whole argument fails. If the "facts" of your argument turn out to be false, then the argument by definition fails. The fact that you think one has to be a professor to make this connection is hilarious.

So the parallel doesn't work. It's a false equivalency.

I hope you feel better now that you've heard yourself talk. We are shown characters going to the bathroom in Harry Potter, though. Welcome to the discussion that has already happened.

Jesus man, don't you think there are better uses of your time than scouring every single car magazine that's ever been published in Germany for their advice on warming up your car?

Again, nothing in the article is about "idling extensively." It's about "idling for a minute or two." And the part you quoted was about the oil in the oil pan. So again, "1000x nope" to what? The one small point about transmission fluid, which isn't even in the part you're responding to?

What do you think you're disagreeing with? All he's advocating is a few minutes, which is exactly what you end up conceding is all right.

When the younger sibling gets older, he'll learn how to deploy this:

You can call me a troll as many times as you want if it pleases you, but the only way I've "been schooled" is if by it you mean I've learned that you are of the kind of disposition that you will argue about something even without knowing anything about it. You didn't know "hordes" could have a derogatory racial…

One, do you really need me to list America's atrocities throughout history, before, during, and after that war? Two, do you not understand the dumb moral equivalency game you're playing when you try to use atrocious acts perpetrated by a cruel political regime as justification for dehumanization of an entire country?…

You're going with number 2, then? AND claiming it's not racist because it's accurate, at the same time. You just did all my work for me.

I was waiting for this. You're almost there. Now that you've looked it up, tell me which of those meanings is appropriate to the usage here.

I think there's something very peculiar about your perverse desire to argue for the right to call a nation of people a "horde" in complete disregard for any non-slur meaning of the word, limp-wristedly claiming that it was both a joke and that it was not. Because everything else that's come up since my initial…

You were where exactly? And how does that make it okay for you to arbitrarily decide what is and isn't forgiven and what racist jokes it's okay to make or not make?