This is a column where we regularly judge and laugh at people for dumb decisions, though. The dumb person in this story is the narrator. So let’s judge and laugh at them. It’s only “pedantic” because you guys are digging in on a dumb position out of sunk cost loyalty.

I would love to see a reality show where they take both sides of this argument, make them live in a house together, chain the doors and bar the windows, and then set fire to it.

Congratulations! You’re officially either an evil asshole or a stupid gullible piece of shit, according to none other than the New York Times!

Literally saved a screenshot of your and tastefulTandA’s comments for bad days in the office. Drupe Terrace is fucking gold.

This is possibly the best comment I have ever seen.

Girl, I hope you’re ready to have perfect attendance, because you’re about to come every day for the rest of the month.

The irony, though, of white westerners complaining that Japanese historical atrocities aren’t well known enough, or are too glossed over, is off the charts. Think about what happened to Germany and Japan as countries as a direct result of the evil they committed. They paid in blood and immense loss. When are the bombs…

Oswald Garrison Villard:

Jesus, man. That fucking stupid generation.

two people who weigh the same thing can look very different

It’s funny because you’re intentionally saying racist things to someone you know without a doubt that it bothers in ways you know you can get away with. It’s almost like you just want to exercise privilege just to rub it in someone’s face because you can. What a brave, clever person.

Then your mom didn’t pay attention in Catechism.

In Catholicism, like in most mainstream Abrahamic sects, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” In Catholicism we’re all fallen. There are no “good people,” and “bad people” — we’re all inherently bad and need saving. That’s the basic premise of the…

"Fierce" does not equal "angry." Anger would involve some frustration, and there's no frustration in knowing you're about to kill some easy prey.

Please put yourself in harm's way immediately. Camera is optional.

Welcome to exactly the whole point of the comment, you fucking moron.

One of the paragraphs by itself would make sense. The two of them together basically disagree with each other. Why the hell would you take that shit so personally?

Too smart, this looks like support to this douche.

“I’m pretty sure a documented fact is false, but I have no actual reasoning or proof to offer.” Cool story, cuntnose.

On review, on the assumption that we're both being honest about how we each drive, it really sounds to me like we drive pretty similarly. We both continually referred to completely opposite hypotheticals to criticize each other's imagined driving styles, but in the end based on our descriptions of our own it just…

This just sounds like "another" opinion that's essentially mincing words to sound like it's not making the same basic point I was making. If you are in the fast lane, you have to be passing the traffic in the slower lane. If you are not, you are going too slow. We agree on that much. So now think a little bit harder…