Sure, that's fairly accurate, except for the first sentence.

Feel free to share with friends.

I think I figured out what to do with this.

Holy shit. I thought you were against going personal? Those questions were that offensive to you?

I'm not angry. If I wanted to make it personal I would just call you a dumb cunt and be done with it, or make a lot of ignorant deductions about what your life must be like and fire them at you in the hopes that some of them will be close enough to the truth to make you feel bad about yourself and elevate me (like…

Oh my god.

No, I don't think that. I thought that the premise of the game asked me to suspend my disbelief about that and I did and everything worked out all right because fiction and video games. Also, do you always not understand irony, or is it just when talking to me?

Read my comment again. I think you responded while I was still editing. Also it's hilarious that you think I was just "rephrasing what (you) said." I wonder why on earth I was doing that.

What a fair and well-thought out reply. If you believe that "most" people were "outraged" about Watch_Dogs, and if that is important to you, then enjoy your feelings, I guess.

Doing cardiac surgery is usually so wonderful and full of flowery fragrances and beautiful sights and sounds, too.

The whole premise of the game is pervasive, dystopian extension of "the internet of things" taken to an extreme. If you're going to be outraged about hacking grenades not lining up with present day reality, you're going to be outraged about most of the game. It's set in a near future and the fact that tech is slightly…