Yes, that’s the Title VII argument.

It’s not surprising that bisexual men would feel more comfortable pursuing relations with a transwoman since they are already “transgressive” in their bisexuality, but the very fact that a straight man can be attracted to a transwoman at least before knowing she is trans, and gay men generally won’t be, kind of gives…

We’re talking about after he leaves office? They would arrest him like anyone else. Is he still in office? There’s an unresolved question about the extent to which the President is amenable to prosecution while in office, but once the Supreme Court weighs in, if it finds it valid, the courts are positioned to issue…

The state court will go ahead, Trump has no mechanism to stop its proceedings.

Not sure why that’s relevant to the level of intent. That could maybe go to causation but then she would be innocent of both charges.

To be sure, of course sometimes gay men hire female prostitutes, I just doubt it occurs in sufficient numbers for female prostitutes to be specifically targeting gay men for much of anything as a general occurrence.

I’m not an expert on Massachussetts law, but very brief research indicates that they are similar to other states in that “involuntary” manslaughter is a lesser included offense, in which involuntariness is not actually an element of the crime. Which makes sense, why would you make a crime where you have to prove a…

I wasn’t paying attention to the state, it’s legal to fire someone for being gay in Kentucky, at least as far as statewide law goes.

Maybe this will help you remember.

You’ve clearly never inherited billions of dollars and an established business. It’s pretty hard to fuck that up.

Seriously, telling Peña-Nieto that was ridiculous “but if you don’t let me push me around the press will think I can’t push you around! It’s not fair, you can’t do that!” My guess is he spends so much time with sycophants he really doesn’t understand that most people don’t give a shit about whether he has problems.

Sweating about what? That they’ll get fired? Escaping from this White House would be a blessing.

She can still sue for discrimination if she can show this wouldn’t have happened were it not for her sexual orientation. That she probably only had the job in the first place because of family ties doesn’t matter. If you have a rule that you only hire employees that sleep with you and you don’t sleep with black people…

First, he wasn’t defrauded because he didn’t lose property. Second, you merely expecting a trans woman to be cis does not mean she has tricked you, on its own. It’s probably a good idea to reveal that you are trans before actual sex (to avoid murder, though it’s by no means a foolproof protection). But if you’re just…

That’s still a step up from what a lot of people seem to believe: Being a gay man = liking things in your ass.

Why would a gay man hire a trans woman as a sex worker?

If they’re victims of bad immigration policy, shouldn’t you be advocating for good immigration policy, like, for example one that wouldn’t disrupt the life a high-achieving young person, force them into contact with criminals and criminal gangs, and render them essentially unemployable?

MS-13 basically exists because the repeat deportations gave people contacts. A sane immigration policy and it wouldn’t exist.

Deported 20 times, clearly deportation works! Wait...

Why not? Suppose you prefer the home, even if it did come with the rule you don’t like, over all the homes without such a rule. Why shouldn’t you buy it, maybe even choosing not to litigate? And, having bought it, why shouldn’t you challenge the illegal rule if you want to?