Is it just me or is the Fox feature about this more of an AAPL product placement thingie than anything? Are you absolutely sure that the iPad got stolen and not that this is a viral ad campaign?
Is it just me or is the Fox feature about this more of an AAPL product placement thingie than anything? Are you absolutely sure that the iPad got stolen and not that this is a viral ad campaign?
You nailed it. Maybe naming it "Acquired Tourette-like syndrome" might be more adequate.
"Kanned's syndrome". Sounds a bit strange, but not too much.
well, then it's at least some great acting on her part. Try delivering a rather complex speech as she does in her video and carry out the range of (in)voluntary movements she is showing in parallel, without having it affect your speech. Good stuff.
ummm, I just comment this comment by not commenting on it...
That looks really chocolatey. You're sure it's not a repurposed chocolate-Santa?
Well, the Republicans are sure doing their part to vote Obama out of office. Any of the clowns that is up as a substitute is more of a placebo.
Yeah, there are OSes that enhance dirty fantasies more than others:-D
Thanks for the only real answer to my question, instead of the usual "if she looks like shite a guy is to blame". Which, in extension, also seems to work for the guy looking at that picture.
I liked her more when she was a negative. Does it mean I like hollow persons?
thank you! In 18 years on the Mac never knew that. Live and learn.
yours explode? Mine come at me through the screen and allow me to grip them. Metaphorically speaking, of course.
congratulations. You just observed that the eyes are never really steadily staring at something, but always moving around, in search for something new, more relevant. It's called a saccade or maybe also a nystagmus. Nothing to worry about, probably, just a few more fancy words to add to everyone's vocabulary;-)
Is that a real photo or a chop? She looks almost anorexic. I didn't get the memo: did Ashton walk out, or did she?
Nice PS-work, Jesus.
Andrew did a lot of tongue-in-cheek in ML. Like "you don't really need to understand calculus for that" and so on which, of course, made me all the more want to brush up on my calculus. I am currently into building an asymmetric backpropagation network. Symmetry is for wussies. Maybe I can get it to work some time:-P
just look at the comments
lemme know when you're up to 50 km without any atrial arrythmia, and I'll come visit and you can show me the countryside;-) Like, from one poor country to another.
does that, by reversed logic, mean you would f*ck any of the two in the background?
Well, I do the same, it's just that my bike doesn't have a motor;-)