Same same. This is the guy who ran the Willie Brown ad, right? Invented the term “welfare queen?”
Same same. This is the guy who ran the Willie Brown ad, right? Invented the term “welfare queen?”
Fuck me, the debate kinda made me like Bernie.
Agreed - she strikes me as being a wonderful combination of someone who has in-depth knowledge of law and policy, history and so forth at a near arcane level, but at the same time is capable of easily translating that into explanations that everyone can understand.
We can put a man on the moon. We can’t provide for Aunt Mary’s breast cancer treatment. Just too hard.
Agreed, but Zeke isn’t your ordinary RB. The Cowboys know his importance. You don’t invest a top 4 pick if you don’t intend to keep him around. He’ll get paid.
Warren is the only one in this whole group I like.
D-Line and RBs are two different worlds. With that said, Jerry will cave and put the Cowboys in cap-hell for the foreseeable future.
He’s not holding out, but Nick Foles has the most leverage in the NFL. Simple machines, man.
wow. the trolls really didn’t like this comment so now I’ll be bringing up you motherfuckers weird cuckolding fetish every chance i get.
That movie could be titled “Nigger: An Idea, A Name, A Function,” with Trump, sitting in a chair smoking a cigarette while reading David Duke tweets, and it still wouldn’t matter.
Yeah, but I have to admit, I am surprised by the fucking National Archives and I hope there’s a review of their release procedures.
About time Indians came out on top of a swap.
his “support the troops” numbers are off the chart.
Guess we forgot the ever-enviable ‘grit’ and ‘football knowledge’ scores. I’m sure they’ve got those behind the paid content section.
I would like to remind you all that the guy who traded away the best LB since Brian Urlacher days before the start of the season, is showering praise on a guy who once threw for 75 yards, 0 TD’s and 2 INT’s in a half, yet managed to IMPROVE his QB rating for that dog shit performance.
is this me growing on Nate Peterman?
For the sake of Nathan Peterman, I hope what Gruden really meant was that Peterman was growing on him as someone who might have a future in coaching or management. Although I don’t know if even that is a good thing when coming from Gruden.
The context of those seven words, which should never be uttered in that order, is even better.
But he’s got some talent. He’s got some athleticism