If you like the top, you should see the bottom.

Hell yeah. I am often out with a good friend who will always order herself a ribeye steak and potatoes. I've had to stick to salads or fish lately because of a strict eating regimen. Waiters always switch up our orders.

Yep! But I believe it's only specific kinds or preparations of yogurt:

It makes sense to me. If you read the Illiad, there's alot of "X thrust his spear at Y, the spear entered Y's eye socket and shot out flecks of bone from his skull, Y breathed his last, darkness covered his eyes, and X stripped his armor." Or - X, son of Y, came from so and so island, and brought fifty ships. Then,…

Haha, I see an Ampersand comment but it's totally divorced from this thread. I was just responding to the OP. At least that's how it looks on my screen.

I think generally it's more intense for them than us, since it's coupled rather intimately to their ability to produce healthy offspring.

Amper? Is that a person? That must be another discussion thread or something.

Thus, the oft-repeated but seldom realized mantra - the patriarchy is also bad for men.

It seems we had the exact same childhood.

If you think men are expected to save the day, but women are not expected to save the day as well, then you may want to reconsider whether you are really a feminist.

You analyze infringement/validity of patents on the Claims, not the Abstract. In this case, Claim 1 isn't much better, which means that given the context of the period in which it was filed, the patent is probably invalid. Minecraft guy just has to pull up some patents or inventions that predate 2005 and do the same…

I... I didn't know it could be like this.

As I'm sure others have pointed out, you can find it on emulator.

Ah I see. Well, if you have time check it out. It's actually quite a good article, in my opinion anyway.

Not to ostracize people but rather so one can see, plainly, whether one is on the appropriate side of the debate, as the virtues of each respective group are demonstrated.

You fell into the complained-about trap: If the article bashes on guys doing x, and the reader doesn't do x, then the reader isn't being bashed. So why assume we're being bashed?

It is not just to place the burden of correction on the victim, instead of the transgressors.

Sick burn.

Why should they 'shut up and work for it,' as you suggest, when they can speak openly about it, in addition to working for it, which is much better? And indeed, the writing of it is part of the working for it, because words, as ever, have accomplished much; or else, historically, those in power would not have ever…

Yes, one sided - but not for women, but rather, non-gender specific justice.