In the movie, the scene features the Wasp, but Disney decided that girls don't buy enough Legos to include her.

It’s Jay Garrick’s. He was the first Flash in the Golden Age & during WW2, then when his sales slipped they canceled his book & replaced him with Barry a few years later. Eventually DC decided they wanted him to make occasional guest appearances though so they decided he was from the parallel universe of Earth2 & had…

“What this really shows is that we need more female characters on film and in television. If there were, the problem would (eventually) go away by itself.”. Yes. Exactly. Ppl keep posting...but flash...hes awkward and cute. But he’s not your only option! I wouldn’t mind if there was a cute awkward girly superheroine…

UGH me too. I am really grossed out that people are calling it “sexual” and “foreplay”. Them’s your hangups, folx.

Funny thing, several MRA and Feminist groups either love it or hate it, there isn’t a full consensus . People need to just fucking stop always fighting, the internet is making people super unable to deal with offense anymore, really sad. Discussions are fine, anger is not. Live and let live.

Absolutely phenomenal Season Finale and I’d go as far as to say this was my favorite Television Series of the 2014-2015 season with a couple others coming very close for a great year of television all around. I rather enjoy the effort in nodding ahead at future plotlines- even if they don’t appear to be that polished…

I understand what you are saying, but I dont like the taste of this idea “What you do is abnormal, so you have to hide it.” We accept differing sexualities... we’ve gotten past it ... it may have been said in the past, that a transgender person wearing makeup or other-gendered clothing in public was rubbing our face…

Interesting tidbit from her New York Times obit:

The more I read about her, the more I realize how many connections there are between her and Betty Draper Francis.

Thank you for standing up for this. Like, calm the fuck down, everyone. Christ, this country.

They look really happy! Also she has excellent taste in spiked collars.

It’s not sexual activity though. If it were, I’d be with you. It’s actually just play, which may or may not turn sexual later. I mean the mall can do whatever they want, but I don’t think there’s any law against walking your girlfriend on a leash in public, and I don’t think there should be.

Your analysis is a little short sighted. There’s a whole world of PDA’s that are considered acceptable in this country (hand holding, hugging, kissing) that could be considered mild forms of foreplay, that very well may lead to the ol' bumpity bump in the near future. I think this type of role play falls into this…

Meh, that argument doesnt work... its backwards... these two arent fucking, there are no naughty bits displayed, and if she is wearing a tail, its of the “attaches-to-the-pants” kind, not the better kind... they are not actually DOING anything sexual. They come nowhere close to “anal penetration in the food court.”

So much this.

As someone who’s worn a collar, though not in public...keep your concern to yourself. She’s clearly happy and consenting.

The liberal knee-jerk reaction that says “Sure! It’s all okay!” is just as dumb as the conservative knee-jerk reaction that says “No! Never okay! Missionary only!” As a kinky person myself, I promise you that there is etiquette we observe just like there is etiquette the general public observes, and it’s damaging to…

People are constantly getting off by things in public without your knowledge or consent.

Consenting adults? A’ight then. You do you.