xxxxxxxxxxxxj
XxxxXxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxj

The PT Cruiser was a smash hit when it was launched. I know most Jalops can’t comprehend that because most of them were still having their moms wipe their asses back then.

I was with you until “- That the American’s were so fearful of the capability of the Arrow, that they knowingly asked Diefenbaker to shut the program in exchange for Bomark missiles, which they convinced him to believe would be needed rather than an interceptor. Some of this was likely due to the development of the

The F-35 won in part because it’s a better plane than the Arrow. Period.

dammit, I wanted to shut down the Arrow fanboiz before they got in, but nothing is quicker to the punch than a Canadian with a persecution/inferiority complex brought on by the Diefenbaker/Arrow controversy.

get over it, it was 40 years ago.

All silly myths. The plane was made by avro - a mess of expat Brit engineers -sodden with whiskey and a militant unionized workforce. The plane was miles away from being producible and there was no market whatsoever for it especially after Canada declined to become a nuclear power.

“Flow of traffic” is not some force of nature. It’s fully determined by the drivers on the road. So people consciously breaking the speed limit is what makes the flow of traffic so high. If everyone slowed down and followed the speed limit, the flow of traffic would suddenly become the speed limit.

I hate that people completely disregard the speed limit on freeways, highways, city streets, and residential neighborhoods. They use the “flow of traffic” or “I can handle it!” excuses and it’s ridiculous. While we may think the speed limits are too low, it’s not up to you to decide. The speed limit was set,

I’m not sure if you understand how stealing works. Asking people to give you money in return for a very clearly defined product with an equally clearly defined limited life cycle is not, by any possible defitition of the word, stealing.

Please stop with the “nothing is going to happen.” It might happen if we change the conversation from “If it didn’t then; it won’t now,” to “Sandy Hook plus this means that something MUST happen.” You seem to be quitting before we even get started.

“it had crappy aerodynamics”

After 25 or so thousand landings I can tell you that those rapid pitch movements were of little use during this landing, gusting or no. Gusts do not have a frequency of 3 per second! There is no certified transport category airplane that needs to be handled like this, it would never have got by the company test

Not too bad, but I prefer the natural lighting over slightly excessive HDR.

Those oversized resto-mod wheels look like poo. I’ll go with original Rally wheels any day. Classic is as classic was.

“Who is he endangering other than himself?”

You’re about the fourth person to ask that question based on my calling out the douchebag rationalization.

a) You probably don’t ride. Believe me, there are plenty of places that are unsafe for a car to pass where it’s no problem for a bike (either due to the bike being able to do the pass or simply because of things like better sightlines due to lane positioning etc). So it comes down to The Law vs. common sense, being

Well, that, and Newton’s 3rd law...

Wake vortices sink so the chopper was not in danger. Had the Airbus gone over the chopper its wake turbulence could have flipped the helo over. Badness.

At first, when I read the post I didn’t want to answer. So many wrong things about it, sure someone will tell him. Thanks.
Now, just to add to your post. It is not about bugs only, it is about gaming itself. There are many ways of classify games, as many as you want but what the article wants goes AGAINST what a game

How about: Relax. Enjoy the fun knowing they did nothing to your untouchable car.