Inflation doesn't necessarily coincide with the value of the dollar.

Shouldn't be a sequel. Naughty Dog clearly is capable of making great games. Why not make a whole new original game?

I can agree with your last statement. I disagree pretty adamantly about Future Soldier being generic. It's one of the few games this generation or ever to get co-op right.

A "bit" of a delivery delay?

That's what happens when co-op is a tack on and not a design decision.

Said it before and I'll say it again: I backed it, saw the huge problems, and asked for a refund.

That's a design problem. Ever played Ghost Recon Future Soldier? Or the co-op special ops missions from MW2?

Yeah, I'm just very turned off by adversarial multiplayer these days. It's not fun.

This picture makes me want to caption it: "aaaahhhh skeet skeet skeet skeet!"

More games need co-operative campaign or co-op vs. CPU missions.

So first you haven't played the game in two years (since 2011) and then claim to have played NCAA 13.

You haven't played the demo, nor have you played the game in about 3 years, then. It has changed DRASTICALLY since 2011.

Typical internet behavior, man. No matter what anyone does, someone on a website somewhere is going to bitch like a 4th grader about it.

You wouldn't actually know that unless you worked for Microsoft.

Except that you know damn well the games would've still cost $59.99 online, just like they do now.

I think it's so weird that there's a sect of gamers out there that were ready and willing to take it raw with no lube.

The salt flowing all over social media is so delicious.

PS+ Standard: $49.99/year. Gets you everything that PS+ gets you so far — discounted games, "instant library" releases, and selected monthly favorites from the "PlayStation Library" or "PlayStation History Collection" or whatever — essentially, one or two PS1, PS2, and PS3 games streaming via Gaikai.

Yeah. Make it $49.99/year for PS+ and limited library and $99.99/year for unlimited library and I'm in.

Speak for yourself.