That's what happens when co-op is a tack on and not a design decision.

Said it before and I'll say it again: I backed it, saw the huge problems, and asked for a refund.

That's a design problem. Ever played Ghost Recon Future Soldier? Or the co-op special ops missions from MW2?

Yeah, I'm just very turned off by adversarial multiplayer these days. It's not fun.

This picture makes me want to caption it: "aaaahhhh skeet skeet skeet skeet!"

More games need co-operative campaign or co-op vs. CPU missions.

So first you haven't played the game in two years (since 2011) and then claim to have played NCAA 13.

You haven't played the demo, nor have you played the game in about 3 years, then. It has changed DRASTICALLY since 2011.

You wouldn't actually know that unless you worked for Microsoft.

Except that you know damn well the games would've still cost $59.99 online, just like they do now.

I think it's so weird that there's a sect of gamers out there that were ready and willing to take it raw with no lube.

The salt flowing all over social media is so delicious.

PS+ Standard: $49.99/year. Gets you everything that PS+ gets you so far — discounted games, "instant library" releases, and selected monthly favorites from the "PlayStation Library" or "PlayStation History Collection" or whatever — essentially, one or two PS1, PS2, and PS3 games streaming via Gaikai.

Yeah. Make it $49.99/year for PS+ and limited library and $99.99/year for unlimited library and I'm in.

Speak for yourself.

10/10, would lol again.

Another question...can we get a Vita version for cross-play Dynasty on the go next gen!?

Haha...alright. I'll give it the old college try.

57 recommendations and every single one is worth it. I lol'd like a God-King.