wsomersetsmaugham
W. Somerset's Maugham
wsomersetsmaugham

Absolutely. Her assumption is that women who have sex before marriage are inherently burdened by that situation which is just absurd and I can't imagine comes from anywhere but a place of trying to stake claim to some sort of moral high ground which, hey now, is pretty fucking un-feminist in judging other women for

This jumped out:

Sexual integrity colored every word with judgment. Judgment I've never felt from ethical sluts.

This CJ person’s Twitter profile describes herself as “all around PITA.” Yep, that sounds about right.

Sure. But isn’t Amber the one screwing Depp out of money here. Maybe she should go make her own money.

I was expecting this kind of reaction from many Jezebel readers. I’m slightly older than most readers, and I subscribe to the old school feminist notion that porn is harmful (to women and men.) I see it as different from erotica, characterized by more mutuality, of which I’m a fan...I realize the issue is really

I guess that my question is this. The current type of porn - mainly targeted st the CIS gendered male gaze market, even with consenting participants - isn’t pushing what I would describe as stories of sexual identity or liberation. I am not about shaming anyone’s sexuality or expression of that but this softly, softly

I didn’t say she wasn’t allowed to talk about her own experience but this is being used to affect society and convince people that pornography is bad. I’m pushing back on the ethics of using a spokesperson with such a loaded backstory. This is like, the #1 thing in my Facebook newsfeed, in my iPhone newsfeed, etc. And

Nah, that’s a perfect starting point. It’s not a good ending point, nor is it a good main point, but given that the starting point for many people in that space is “This hurt me personally, might it be bad in general?”, porn-as-rapist-manual is a fantastic impetus for that thought process.

There is a zero percent chance that Amy Cragg and Shalene Flanagan wouldn’t do this if they were mid- or back of the pack.

God, men are so emotional

What amuses me the most about the Clinton scaremongering is that it’s coming from people who absolutely worship Ronald Reagan, who really did suffer from a neurological condition (alzheimer’s) while in office and hide it from the public. I’m sure every single of one these people would retroactively defend Reagan’s

Fox’s main medical concern appears to be with regards to the patient’s alarming lack of male genitalia.

So shiny!

I believe that Brendan’s stepdad did it. I mean, Avery might have done it, but I find it hard to believe that in a shitty, dirty, dusty trailer he could have raped and killed Halbach and not a single speck of her DNA, other than blood on the clearly planted key, was found. There was a huge layer of dust on the bed,

Correction: his attorney wasn’t inept. His attorney was corrupt, selfish, and hoping to become a local hero after his so horrible client went to prison for killing the nice Christian girl Teresa Hallback.

“I think the weight of mediocrity really becomes undeniable when you’re in the latter half of your twenties.”

No. Fuck him. No one (in my book, at least) gets a pass for claiming to be “pro-life” when they clearly don’t give a damn about already living, breathing children. This bastard is anti-abortion, not pro-life, and that makes him a hypocrite for claiming otherwise.

“Caitlyn just wasn’t relatable,”

It’s your fault for not having the strength and foresight to have a wealthy family and plenty of fuck you money so that you can quit your job without consequences. Sad!