Gizmodo “Stop asking writers to write about products they hate” challenge.

Gizmodo “Stop asking writers to write about products they hate” challenge.
Nobody wants to work anymore!
“I’m not mad! Please don’t put in the newspaper that I got mad!”
That’s a lot of words to say “I don’t care if people perceive me as an asshole; I’m just going to continue to be me.”
You walked in and laughably tried to be an expert, never once understanding that screeners are sent to reviewers that include more episodes than what have aired. Doing absolutely no research, you pretended that Linda doesn’t know what she’s talking about, and every single point you posted was objectively wrong. You…
Put me in the camp of those who will resist this until I’m absolutely forced to do it. The “single point of failure” that is referenced by multiple commenters should be more than enough of a reason to avoid this.
I’ve read your comments in this thread, and I stand by what I said. Your entire argument is summed up by “70 years/95 years is too long because I said so.” I promise you, if you found yourself in a situation where you went from content consumer to content creator, you’d think differently. And if you didn’t feel…
It’s always people with no skin in the game who want to change IP law. A good first step might be to take the time to understand IP law first.
Quick, what do you think the purpose of a dress code is?
I responded to the phrase:
Everyone has eyes on these events specifically just to see trailers and gameplay, and whenever a person steps in between that and the audience, people hate it.
Ah yes, “liberalism” is where we allow people to have lesser sentences for crimes because they decided to have children. Congratulations, Florida Man: you cracked the code!
Imagine thinking, “well, it’s OK that she gets a different punishment because she bred.”
Hogwart’s will likely pull in GotY awards
Tesla backtracked on how the feature is used following the DPA’s investigation by requiring the owner to approve the camera to record and alert people that the camera turned on by flashing its headlights.
“A Court decision excluding ‘recommendations’ from Section 230’s liability shield would sweep widely across the internet, and cause providers to limit online speech to reduce their risk of liability, with harmful effects for users’ ability to speak and access information,” said Reeve Givens.
Don’t people just go and add as much as the computer will allow?
Found Brad Pitt’s publicist’s burner account.
I like to think of it as more of a PSA.
Kinda wild how your entire comment history consists of nothing but sad, desperate attempts to be taken seriously.