Further complicating things: the hologram of Snoke looks pretty good (I thought he was actually in the room on Starkiller Base until his hologram turned off), as do the holograms used in space chess.

Cool magazine, but it was very uncool of them to steal an image from a Daniel Clowes comic and use it without paying or crediting him.

Here you go—his name is Jabari Dean, age 21, but it doesn’t specify race: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/bre…

I don’t see how there could be an El stop at U of C since the Green Line runs several blocks west of the Hyde Park neighborhood.

Wait—UIC? Or U of C? Those are two different schools.

Was expecting at least one mention of someone named Aquafina or something, which I think was some young girl on the VMA’s last night. I think it might be spelled Awkwafina, maybe?

Do these signs work? All of these examples remind me of this classic from the Onion: http://www.theonion.com/article/poster…

Kinda shocked people believe there were any authentic moments during the VMAs, outside of Kanye’s speech. Do you also believe that Bieber was really crying?

Nicki would have “gone hard”? She starts laughing right before the shot changes to Miley as she responds, so that seems to suggest it’s fake.

I went to Notre Dame, and I read an editorial against homosexuality in the Observer back in the early 90s which said that gay sex was wrong because male and female sex organs were designed for each other—it read in part, “the penis is designed to go inside the vagina.” I wrote a letter (that was never published) in…

Speaking of context, are you defending the article? Or no? As for myself, I’m not saying it’s guilty of plagiarism, but I do find it very unoriginal, and I disagree with some of its statements, like the claim that Buzz flies when he is clearly “falling with style.”

I can’t address only part of one’s statement and have to address the comment as a whole? Nonsense. That’d be like if you said, “I live on earth. Oklahoma is on earth. Therefore, I live on earth” and expecting me to object to your statement that you live on earth. I can agree with part of what you said, your conclusion…

I’m not arguing that one inspired the other. I’m arguing that saying “It’s old” doesn’t work to defend the plagiarism charge.

It reminds me of those stupid theories that take children's movies and TV shows and forces the darkest interpretation on them, like the Rugrats one where Angelica has to imagine the other babies because they've been aborted or some shit.

The article “is old”? 1. It's from February of 2014. 2. What does something's age have to do with whether or not it was plagiarized?

The Olsen quints

What’s next, a video where the husband surprises his wife with the news that she’s ovulating?

She tells Sales that some dudes bring multiple Tinder dates in in a night are assholes.

Fuckhead #1 with the douchey ponytail has no business judging anyone else's hair.