The Institute is a bunch of scientists who need a large workforce to continue doing things like digging tunnels and securing prewar parts or conducting certain experiments on the surface- the synths do that, and human-like synths can do it largely undetected. Although to be honest it kind of seems like they really…

Uh usually the player is the instigator, yeah?

They don’t, though. According to the actual experts (you know, the guys who built them) the synths are just extremely good imitations of sentience. Meaning that when they go AWOL, it’s not because of free will — it’s due to tampering.

Gotta say, if it was the first time I’d ever turned on a lightsaber, I would hold it further away from my face. And friends.

Yup. It’s the best.

Right wtf Bethesda

Set all physics objects to -0.1 lbs and they will lift themselves!

I will! Don’t think I won’t! Then you’ll be sorry!

Haha, sounds like one of your settlers doesn't appreciate the clutter. Roommates amirite?

Sweet, sweet victory.

I like how both of us have conceded, at this point, that no actual communication has occurred here. Now, if I can get you to reply just once more, I get a set of steak knives...

You’re the one trying to prop up your flimsy argument by linking to other sites. I just think it’s funny that none of them remotely support your more asinine ideas, and one flat out disagrees with you (and calls people who hold your views ‘posers’, I liked that bit also).

Thanks for sharing. I particularly enjoyed this bit from the Breitbart piece:

I am supremely something! (‘done with this conversation’)

Another thing to be wrong about; you’ve amassed quite a collection at this point. Stop digging!

You keep falling back on this - that I don’t understand. It’s a poor device. No, I fully understand your position. I understand it, deep in my bones, I do.

At long last, I have fallen into your cunning rhetorical trap. Kotaku stole Bethesda’s proprietary news and published it without permission. That’s airtight, man.

This wasn’t ‘corporate espionage’ for the same reason that copyright doesn’t apply: because Kotaku doesn’t sell a competing product. It sells ad space on news. This was news. When journalists do ‘corporate espionage,’ and then tell the world about it, it’s called ‘news reportage’ and subject to some fairly broad…

You must think that’s a very strong argument if that’s what you’d like to rest on. It isn’t. Copyright might be useful to you in the sense that it gives a moral and legal scenario where some speech is bad and censorship is good — but it has nothing to do with what we’re talking about, and in a broader sense is pretty…

So, here we are again. Your argument is that sometimes, information should be secret, or withheld by the media. You are of the opinion that this is one of those cases.