Wealthy people who aren’t on the run and are being sought by the police have their lawyers negotiate a surrender and quick bail.

Wealthy people who aren’t on the run and are being sought by the police have their lawyers negotiate a surrender and…

This. Women are just the score-keeping mechanism for getting points with their bros.

You can stand by his right now! He has the right to party with whoever he wants. Other people also have the right to say “because you party with awful people, I don’t want to be around you or do business with you.”

Obtuse or trolling, given that he simultaneously whines that “nuance exists” while comparing an asshole CEO stepping down to “the Salem Witch Trials”. You know, where people were tortured to death and murdered.

I’m a little baffled by the repeated “but the cities weren’t cool” complaints. Yes, throughout much of human history, there weren’t giant, built-up cities everywhere with layers and layers of architecture, streets, byways, tall buildings, etc. built up over centuries of human habitation. Yes, some of the historically…

Reminder that “the mythological narrative arc known as the hero’s journey” was completely made up by a deeply problematic pop-scholarship dude who cherry-picked bits and pieces of myth to fit his theories, and couldn’t even come up with a single real-world myth that fully followed this narrative arc. It achieved…

Sure. I don’t have any opinion on these particular allegations, just that there really is no conflict between “believe women” and “do I conclude to some legal standard that this dude in fact did what he is accused of doing.” 

They aren’t worried about proving damages. They are likely considering the deterrent effect of suing him in the first place. There would likely be a quick settlement, but the point would be made. 

“where no process servers can find me”, you mean.

He agreed to the NDA to get access to information that would help him promote his brand.

I’m very much in the “believe women” camp

Exactly. We keep seeing these predictions about how AI is going to replace humans for therapy, or art, or whatever, and yet we can’t even get customer service chatbots that seamlessly replace humans - even though replacing human labor has huge financial incentives.

No. If the art or text was created by the AI, not a human, then it’s not copyrightable. Remember the monkey selfie case?

AI-created art and text can’t be copyrighted or trademarked.

Yes, it was clear that you were a software engineer, given the proposal that human-created art is old timey and has already gone the way of the horse-drawn carriage.

No mention of how this might impact your existing car insurance or whether you are covered for ‘commercial use’?

Best of both worlds!

Are you on the West Coast? Garages full of crap are our version of basements full of crap.

And whether the state you’re buying in requires those kinds of disclosures.  

Miss me with this noise about “too sensitive”. These bros are the first ones to go “ewwwww, stop” as soon as the free-wheeling and edgy conversation turns to something they don’t think is sexy.