Thank you! Naturally, she’s working in ADR now.

1) Please identify the judge who ‘joked’ with her conservator that he shouldn’t tell her what her rights are. Call these fuckers out.

Now we know why he moved back to Columbus. He made a lot of noise at the time about how important it was for him to return to Ohio, blah blah back to his roots, whatever. He was hoping Master Thiel would buy him a Senate seat. Too bad for him that Ohio voters don’t think much of this carpetbagging fraud.

Or, he might see no need to deal with social media and find no value in using it to build a ‘brand’? I also hope he doesn’t take a heel turn, but I don’t think backing off having an IG is a sign of that.

Also, isn’t is just respecting her wishes? She can’t stop talking at every opportunity about how she’s John McCain’s daughter, so why not honor her wishes by using her title instead of her name?

Let’s be frank, though. This wasn’t UNC foolishly getting carried away with culture-war anxiety, this was their well-established, racist old guard having FEELINGS about an accomplished Black woman saying things that made them uncomfortable.

They’re also a great source for drinking glasses and plates if you have small children, because restaurants’ dinnerware have to survive a lot of abuse. When my kids were little, we got a stack of those slightly pebbly juice glasses that you see at every diner, and those things lasted forever. 

Yes, it’s called “voir dire”, and it’s intended to determine whether the jurors can be fair and impartial deciders. They aren’t witnesses. I am assuming there is some jank-ass Ace Attorney logic for why the jurors are being interrogated and am curious as to what that is.

Wait, no explanation of why you’re interrogating JURORS? I know the Ace Attorney’s relationship with actual court cases makes Law and Order look like a documentary, but whoa.

If women were really turning up at bars wearing body cameras, dude there would be shrieking about MISANDRY!!!!111

Yes, it happens all the time. “My client is very very sorry and look at all these nice things they did, other than the crimes of course, so maybe just give them time served and probation?” That doesn’t mean it will work, but trying to keep her out of prison is literally her lawyers’ job.

Perfect article - short, informative, and to the point!

Let’s not forget that he may also have to work off some tax fraud charges.

Whether or not it’s a “statement car”, GM has made electric vehicles for some time and there are Volts parked in that lot. It’s just some idiot who thinks Tesla is a Japanese car. 

It’s not about whether Rudy can do legal work for others. It’s about whether other lawyers want to risk their licenses to practice by amplifying his bullshit for him.

He’s done a very good job of positioning himself in spaces where he can leverage the attention of white people who aren’t otherwise paying attention to the discourse from Black activists (especially Black women).

I am actually asking, because the ‘receipts’ he has shown do not answer the complaints about him, and he has a long, long history of failed projects and broken promises behind him based on grandiose plans. He responded to recent claims of fraud by an ‘audit’ undertaken by his friends. You can believe he has the best…

He really seems like one of those fragile types who believes his own bullshit. THIS time, the grandiose project really is going to take off. THIS time, he won’t overpromise or underdeliver or build on the backs of others’ labor. And he’s always got an excuse for why LAST time didn’t work out.

Hasn’t he also changed his story about who his biological father is, from claiming he was a Black man to claiming he was biracial?

Honestly though: is it that you don’t know what to believe, or that you don’t want to believe?