wilson_c
Wilson
wilson_c

Is there something you'd like it to do that's impossible without newer hardware?

Thunderbolt? Seriously? Why would you need a 10Gbps interface between two devices which can't come anywhere close to moving data that fast? Hard drives or NAND speeds are going to be the limiting factor there.

You're right. BlackBerry still does pretty well among a set of young customers. Their phones can be had for next to nothing and aren't really worth the bother of stealing, so I get the appeal there. Also, less likely to get distracted all those apps.

If they were lying about where they were, she's not insecure, she's rightfully aggrieved. Your central point is correct, though. If you're the sort of person who lies to your spouse, best to turn off those features or you're in for a world of trouble.

@Dominic Corona

@Jordaan Mylonas

@Jr_Pharaoh

@Tadashii

@Tadashii

@BetaMaxx11

Trademarks are applied for by broad class of service or product. To protect your mark across all possible marketing media as well as the product medium, you need to apply for any class which might conceivably ever be involved. It's not really as ridiculously broad as the article makes it seem.

Don't get me wrong, new VWs are good cars here. They drive nicely and feel appropriately German, but in the late 90s something happened reliability-wise and their reputation among people who care about cars has nosedived.

Let's be fair here. RIM tries to sidestep the limited library of apps by pointing to their Android app capability. If the Android apps you can actually use are only a small subset of apps you might want to use, that's a pretty valid criticism. I feel like this just takes a dump on the Playbook marketing by being

Dear Herr Winkertorn,

@The Lone Scout

@EnigmaNemesis

It's not about graphics whoring. I've always turned down my settings until framerate is as smooth as possible.

And if Americans had really wanted to own cars, they would have built their own transcontinental interstate freeway system privately and it wouldn't have been done by the government.

Uggh! I didn't mind the price increase. They've been offering more service for the past decade and their pricing hasn't kept up with inflation. I'm all for them doing what's necessary to negotiate better for the streaming service. It's certainly the only service I *want* to use, but I also recognize the licensing

Who gives a shit? Just buy them both and be done with it. They're video games priced to sell to kids without jobs. If you can't afford two $60 purchases then stop playing everything for a while and focus on your earning ability.