willywanker84681
CaptainFabulous
willywanker84681

I don't really get all the hate either. I find it funny enough that I chuckle a few times during most episodes, and sometimes bust out a good belly laugh. It's certainly better than most sitcoms that are so horribly unfunny I can't even sit thru them, or don't even crack a smile if I do.

While some of the laughter is genuine it's boosted by "laugh" signs and canned laughter that's added in later for scenes they feel didn't get quite enough laughs.

WTF did I just read? Does Jezebel pay by the word? Is the author unaware that the events depicted in this movie are from over 150 years ago, and that at one point or another in the history of the human race pretty much everyone was treated like shit, including today?

So Johnny freely admits he cheated on his wife dozens, if not hundreds of times, but gets all bent out of shape when she cheats on him?

He was just making human tortillas.

The time investment is minimal, an hour, maybe two. You order the parts, you assemble them, and install the OS (which while it's installing you can be off doing other things).

Oh, I understand that. My point was only to note that some of the complex setups people have created are total overkill in the home. Shuttling and streaming video doesn't require anything more than an old PC or laptop on your network running Windows 98 or higher — it certainly doesn't require expensive specialized

Yes, but there is nothing in there that requires continued innovation beyond the initial design. Let's say for shits and giggles I invented the mouse and patented it, and then never created another thing nor tried to improve upon my original design. Certainly I'd be entitled to reap the benefits when other companies

But is it really an "abuse" of the law? There is nothing in patent law that states one must actively use one's patents or create anything. In fact, it's the lack of such a regulation that allows companies like this to buy up huge portfolios of patents and then seek payments when other companies use them.

Uh'Murica! FUCK YEAH!!!

Interesting that Sara Gilbert would be one to criticize considering her own nose is half the size it used to be.

Oh, I understood everything he said. But to me it seems like 1000x overkill for the home. Nightly backups and images? Centralized file server? Remotely fixing server issues?

Uh'Murica! FUCK YEAH!!!

Jesus Christ are they still trying to milk SFIV?

Because Razer has stated publicly they want to be just like Apple?

$1800 base price? Sorry, they can keep it. Way overpriced. Considering they've admitted they admire and want to mimic the "Apple experience" where you're paying for design and not functionality I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

But that's the thing — if you already have a halfway decent Android smartphone you don't need a Ouya. You already have a superior gaming platform in your hands. All you need is a bluetooth controller and an MHL cable, both of which can be had for less than half the cost.

If you really want a bargain XBMC and games emulator get a Raspberry Pi. Less money and does more.

Well for significantly less money than a Ouya one can buy a bluetooth controller and and MHL cable to attach their Android smartphone to any TV with an HDMI input. And because your phone is likely 2-3x more powerful than this box you'll get a superior gaming experience.