You are right! Saying get over was inappropriate on the OPs part. On the other hand, the banks are right in that, if you can only afford a home on two home incomes and your wife is on unpaid maternity leave, it would be unwise to lend money to a family that currently cannot meet that financial commitment. This should…

That sounds exactly like what I said. Everyone can get it, but they are "at risk." As are intravenous drug users. Its not because they are bad or at fault. It is just the mechanics of what is being done leads to more fluid transmission.

What would the education be? That everyone can get it, but they are the primary risk group in the USA?

What you said still makes Aramark the better financial choice. You pay them less than state employees and get money back in fines. The only losers are the prisoners.

Yeah, I hate ghosts. If the field is hot and haunted, I am out of there.

Did they stop doctors from prescribing it or pharmacies from giving it out? No? Then it isn't a rights violation. The company has specific benefits package that may cover some things and not other things.

Teddy was a big fan of that. Basically instigated the Spanish American war the while secretary of the navy, then joined the army because he wanted to go to war.

Thank you?

Well to be fair, if you threw a baseball like a girl threw a softball everyone would be like ?dafuq?

I didn't know we did that. #themoreyouknow

The "Married my best friend" trope is ridiculous. Nobody's wife should be their best friend. Maybe their 2nd or 3rd best friend. With as many best friends as people will have throughout their lives, it cheapens their marital relationship by describing it as such. Also, my best friend has never had my child.

Building the canal or giving it back? Or did he go to spring break in Florida?

I mean, as a rule, you have a pretty range within your own race. If this busty blue eyed blonde dressed in a NBA throwback and sagged and had a doo (Sp?) rag, there would be a conflagration of comments.

That might be what your hippy humanities 101 teacher told you, but that isn't the accepted definition. No matter how many people here repeat it, it isn't changing. There is a difference between systematic racism(what you referenced) and racism (arguably what she may have done).

Except as Student Body President, aren't you expected to be more sensitive then the (potentially) insensitive dude-bros?

Well if he is a farmer, it would be tough as the government does nothing to protect them from race based crimes.

As student body President, you are in power. Each ecosystem has its own power structure. On a national level, this wouldn't be racists, but if you think regional, local, hierarchical, then the power dynamics switch. For example, if you are a white kid in a predominately minority school and you get beat up and made fun…

Oh no, affirmative action not working the way you'd hope?

They already have that ability. Some parents don't allow kids any sort of medicine.

Diplomatic immunity is supposed to cover all crime so when you are a diplomat in a potentially hostile country, you can't be grabbed and subjected to something you may or may not have done. Wouldn't it be easy for a country to manufacture a case against an official from an a less than civil country or vice verse? It…