I am just saying, the Irish police shooting someone is about as likely as me shooting someone as neither of us carry guns.

They fired their guns. He didn't. How is that an equivalent .

You included the gun detail so people would click your article and think he was the agressor. Clearly your article actually has good info, but titles are like make-up in dark bars, it just needs to look good enough because eventually their invested and its too late. Lets just use a little honesty Lindy.

She doesn't, but he does because he owns it. That is the point. If I pull what you believe to be a gun on you, you are likely to stop hitting me. If you continue to hit me, its not any worse because even if you take it from me, you still don't have a functioning weapon.

Wouldn't someone who owns said broken know that?

It is when you don't plan on firing it.

He was arrested for a DUI when he was yelling about jews.

Irish police can't shoot anyone because they don't have guns.

"The people that hold all the cards in that game are some awful mother fuckers. For real."

Its only those things if you actively pursue that agenda. If you just think that god won't allow them into heaven, but it isn't your place to do anything about it and you treat people well, you aren't an asshole. You are wrong because god isn't real, but you aren't a crazy asshole.

Well played, but we aren't talking about the guy overloading his trailer or the dude driving the mustang with the 3 wheels. We are talking about a healthy enough car.

In lots of states, that rule is being repealed. I don't know enough about Canada, but the judge seems to have found it a valid charge. Also ducks are mean.

We already agreed they both broke the law. I can't think of a good analogy, neither would be perfect.

Except here is the thing with laws, when you violate one and something worse happens, you are responsible for that too. Example, I blow a red light and tbone a family of five, killing them all. Its an accident. I am still responsible for their death. This is the same.

Its not easy to tell a car is slowing down or stopped without break lights or hazards. Obviously you eventually find out, but that is why they cite people for lights being out.

A person has agency. A broken car doesn't. That is why it matters. Willful negligence is the persons fault. Accidental breakdowns are the cars fault and you can't punish a car.

Yeah, but they are reporting the max. If she does over 10 years, I will give you 100 dollars. She might get sentenced to something crazy, but she will be out before 10 years.

That is why she is rightfully being hit with criminal negligence. This just means she is so stupid that it is a crime.

I don't break for anything, but people before looking in my rear view. I have had to go through a dear because the SUV behind me seemed substantially more dangerous.

She is as willfully negligent as a drunk driver who kills someone. Most drunk drivers are attempting to get from point A to B and happen to kill someone. It was because they made the willfully negligent choice to drink and drive. She made an equally negligent choice of stopping in the middle of the fast lane without…