Not really what BFV needs to advertise right now.

I am skeptical.

Neutral: No.  Tesla ran on cool, and then decided to pursue the least cool car segment out there because they thought that their initial success (read: hype) meant that they could upend the entire industry.

This is the first pink car I’ve ever seen that I’d actually get in a fight to drive.  It’s just...perfect.

If they think they’ll make money charging to enter the city, they should try charging you to leave.

Of course you can.  The foundation isn’t advertising the groups at the stores.  This isn’t like managing a political rally.

You’re being disingenuous. The article states clearly that their denial is a matter of CFA’s donations to religious organizations and has no other cause.  It is a blatant free speech issue, there’s no other way to frame this.

But a Chik-Fil-A restaurant is not engaging in speech when it operates. It’s not proselytizing or advertising for the groups in question. It’s selling chicken sandwiches. The refusal to permit them to operate is punitive for the private and religiously-motivated decisions of their owners elsewhere.

“If you want to do business in this public area you can’t donate to that religious organization.”

Nice to see the 1st Amendment is going to get more exercise in court.  It was getting a little flabby.

Back in the day, you’d just sleep with their wife and be done with it.

“You’re being hypocritical!”

Like Free Willy, but more bitchin’.

Take that, Drumpf!

“And for an extra $10 billion, we’ll throw in VTOL capability.  Delivery TBD”

Someone is saying that it’s Brexit related.

Alright, why do you keep doing this?

People keep swinging at CFA, and CFA always comes out looking good.

“I don’t just want food, I want emotional validation!”

...really?  Or is this a joke?