whyorwhynot
whyorwhynot
whyorwhynot

Yeah, at least she is a typical politician so we know what we’ll get. Trump is like in a whole other dimension... I have voted for who I want every four years since I turned 18. This time I am only voting so I can vote against who I don’t want and will choose whoever has the best chance of accomplishing that.

Like that time she called for mass deportation or building a wall and making an ally pay for it. Or the time she made fun of a reporter with disabilities. Or that time she said she could shoot someone in the head and not lose a single vote. Remember the time she as a candidate for a major political party called

To be fair, some of these are all-women schools like Agnes Scott. The likelihood of a rape happening on campus is lower in those circumstances.

“Hillary is the lesser of the two evils at this point it seems.”

ZERO?

Please, Satan himself calls Trump for advice on how to better run hell.

I don’t know why this show doesn’t get as much praise. I think it’s great and I like it more than the Amy Schumer show and she’s done a lot better than what Hannibal Buress did. Comedy Central is great, it’s the best hour on TV and they have the best show on TV now imo (Nathan For You). I hope this show last for

Does anyone else struggle with the ambiguity of “coercion,” especially in the context of sex crime studies? The definition always seems fluid depending on who is doing the study and it never feels clearly defined for me.

Those force and threat numbers for athletes versus non-athletes show the importance of accountability for wrongdoing. Athletes know they’ll be given a level of protection if they’re accused of sexual assault that non-athletes won’t get.

So you are completely irrational. Got it.

Quick history lesson: Bush v. Gore -> Bush Winner > Perpetual War > 1 million? dead > ISIS (not the fun one) > Obama > Trump?)

She’s a temptress like Eve.

Considering the amount of deaths fentanyl has caused in the past year, I’m actually shocked someone is addicted to it and still around to talk about it.

There’s a difference between giving someone advice on how to reduce their risk of getting raped, and telling them it’s their fault if they get raped because they deviated from that advice.

Or demanding that men be removed from all positions of authority since they are prone to strike once under the influence.

It’s good advice. The problem is men rape women when they’re drunk because it’s easier. But if every woman stopped drinking tomorrow, men would still commit rape. Perhaps by putting date rape drugs into nonalcoholic drinks instead of alcoholic drinks. What then? Should women stop drinking anything in public? Women in

But it doesn’t matter if I’m sober, I still can’t necessarily ward off the advances of a rapist. It’s not a woman’s intoxication- although that does make them ideal targets for opportunists- it’s her lack of power, physically and politically.

That's exactly why I can't imagine being famous or a corporate-sponsored athlete. The freedom to speak up for your beliefs is what you give up in exchange, not something I could ever imagine for myself, and not the example I'd ever imagine passing to the little ones in my family.

I understand when a company wants to be apolitical, but where does it end? Is it too political to stand against a bigot?

WANT THE BOOK