This is why Ford should have held onto Mazda. It gives them a way to put Japanese luster on an American product.

Ironically, the Accord is the only one rocking a Bangle Butt.

"How is it financially bad to plan your life around events that are statistically rare, do you actually have proof of this or did you just like how it sounded?"

Financially, it's a bad idea to plan your life around events that are statistically extremely rare. You can be prepared for 99.99999% of anything that could happen to you, but it's going to cost a ton.

You should see a therapist if your anxiety starts to negatively affect your life.

I was hoping that the GT350 would the Mustang to get the 3.5L ecoboost engine.

Neutral: Is The Car Market About To Implode? And are automakers ready for it? Which ones? How?

Fine, it's a minivan substitute, but it's still a mommy-mobile. Only, it screams, "I care more about image than practicality."

The SRT-6 was an amazing sleeper. Most people don't know that it can run 11s with bolt-ons.

The Terminator is awesome, but the GT500 kind of stole its thunder. It's hard to swallow $30k for a Terminator when you can grab a 07 GT500 for low-mid 30s.

This might come as a surprise to you, but FWD can handle extremely well. The 80-90s was a golden era where FWD cars could out-handle Porsches. Hondas use to be common sights at race tracks 10-15 years ago, kind of like Miatas are now.

If anything, Honda needs to continue to carve out a niche with the Ridgeline. Nobody in the 90s would have thought that the SUV would die at the hands of a FWD CUVs, but that's what happening.

Owning an ITR is a massive headache and is not worth it. My friend owned one since it was new. He finally got rid of it because he was tired of people coming up and asking to buy it or leaving notes on the car saying as much when he'd drive it. He was constantly worried that people were trying to steal it.

Only $58,000 + shipping!!!

These are the same chassis, but the diesel version has 75 less horsepower and worse tires/suspension/brakes. For what reason would anybody think that this would the diesel version would perform better? You'd have to be stupid to think that.

A bank won't accept this many pennies unless you call ahead and confirm it with them. Converting change is actually a massive headache when it amounts to >$1000.

Actually, the celica has a good amount of throttle-lift oversteer at the limit. It's only noticeable above 60-70, unless it's raining.

Hey, I'm the one that's driven both, and I'm telling you that they are extremely similar. The drive that I took in an FR-S was on roads where I know exactly how fast I can take each corner in most of the cars that I've had, and since it was a friend's car, I had the opportunity to go back and try them again a few…

Last gen. Call BS all you want, but being RWD doesn't make much of a difference at these power levels. They handle pretty much identical on the backroads. The biggest difference was in power delivery, since the FRS is geared better and doesn't rev so high.

Magazines overstate their acceleration times by a lot. I believe they use a stopwatch (which isn't very accurate) and they can essentially destroy the car in pursuit of the perfect time. Plus, they can try again repeatedly, until they get a number they like. As a result, our expectations are very skewed.