Well of course it’s Ray Ratto being the only one talking sense on here.

I mean this would have happened either way because Hillary Clinton was basically a Republican, right guys?

“Most men don’t lust after married women”.........

Wow this fake story is fake.

I don’t know you. I don’t know what your background is, I suspect you probably have a lot of valid reasons in your life to not trust white men. Your comment made me mad and I posted something to....I don’t know what. What’s some study supposed to prove? Lately, I’ve been frustrated seeing the ease with which some…

And here is a link suggesting the exact opposite. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ejsp.2531 Anyone who has a lack of agency in life is more likely to fall prey to conspiracy theories to try to make sense of it.

She was in Clerks 2, not Clerks.

This shit is so good and I keep being afraid someone’s going to notice and take him away from here.

If so, how the fuck did we not hear anything about wingspan?

Mellon Collie for this guy, Rage Against the Machine and NIN was too scary for me.

I assure you from the bottom of my heart Entourage is the guiltiest of pleasures.

Boo this woman!

I did say several times in this thread and in others I agree with his point about algorithms and Netflix, I just think him using it into an excuse to bitch about his job is stupid and self serving and a good editor would have taken it out.

“If you write about television the way I mostly do, which is through reviews—recaps, if you insist—of individual episodes, even Netflix is difficult to write about. Netflix’s own business model ensures this.”

I think people are capable of judging if a show is worth their time or not even if all the episodes are available at once, and certainly independent of whether or not an online writer has an easy way to structure their fucking job. It’s a weak ass point. 

Acie Law IV

This is why one of the Splinter writers was bitching about it on Twitter, it’s an incredibly astute move and hurts Uncle Bernie’s chances tremendously if he pulls it off.

Just love this new cycle of Step 1. Be a racist bully, Step 2. Get called out for it in a public fashion, and then Step 3. Argue that actually YOU’RE the victim and sue for lots of money. 

It’s not his main thesis, but it doesn’t belong in the article at all. It’s not remotely germane to the larger point he’s trying to make. And it’s so completely self-serving that it overshadows the rest of the article. You go from thinking “Jesus why am I supporting to Netflix?” to thinking “Jesus, why am I listening…

More people will die if you propose things that no one will vote for. All you’ll have is your own smug satisfaction that you were right.