“Things don’t need a purpose.” Then. What. Is. This. Entire. Argument. About.

Dude, you want to keep saying “keyboard warrior,” but again, you felt the need to offer an unnecessary opinion on other people’s feelings on a damn game, that, again, you don’t actually seem to care about yourself, complete with assumptions…

“You literally can not help yourself.” Dude, let me give you a life tip: Telling other people what their motivations are tend to neither necessary nor accurate.

If *I* can’t help myself, what exactly is going on with YOU? 

You can insist you don’t *feel* offended all you want, but you still *chose* to weigh in, in a public forum, on how people reacted to a video game, and now seem quite confused at receiving a response, as if only agreement was permitted.

Dude, “purpose” doesn’t mean anything in a scientific context. It’s a value judgment, which science is not in the business of making. So are “violate” and “failed.”

If you can prove otherwise, please do. Surely there must be a source somewhere on the internet using these words the way you keep stomping your feet and…

Well, that’s how that sentence reads, but I suppose it’s “stupid” to interpret words as meaning what they mean.

Uh...rape *is* violence, and a tool of the strong to assert dominance.

Then give me a good reason to rape someone.

Explain how a “purpose”—an inherently subjective concept—can be a “scientific reality.”

You don’t understand subjectivity very well, do you?

I mean, yes, I *DO* just just being is contrary to having a purpose—I thought I’d made that quite clear—because it is. That’s how that works.

You can huff and puff about how I’d…

Nothing “failed” because there is no goal. Something just happened. That’s it.

Things. Don’t. Need. A. Purpose.

I kind of want to see how long you’ll continue throwing a fit over this.

“Darwinism was controversial because it disputed traditional creationism, the idea that some thing was guiding the process. It removed an explicit need for a divine being.”

Read your own words a few times and maybe you’ll get it. 

So you don’t get your own contradiction here, do you?

I guess biology just fails quite frequently, then, but you still need to have a personal issue with people choose to “violate” it?

“keyboard warrioring for some strange reason” Dude. You’re the one who started an argument over your offense at people being offended at a video game, for some reason. HUSH. 

You seem *exceedingly* resistant to the idea that things can Just Be. And I mean, a lot of people are. But staying there after so much supposed education is certainly...Impressive.

Oh my fucking Lord, why am I bothering.

You either are *very* committed to this game or you literally have no idea that you’re just repeating intelligent design with the explicit religion stripped out, and I don’t even know which is worse.

I’ll bite just because I’m curious what answer I’ll get--why WAS Darwinism so…

So, the other possibility I presented, then?

*yawn*

Dude. You understand that one of the *major* principles both scientists highlight is that biology doesn’t have a “purpose,” right? Right????

...So, they all “acted against their biology,” or extinction is just an extremely common feature of biology? You realize there are literally *more* extinct species than extant species, right?

I don’t feel like you’re defining anything in a remotely useful way, dude. Everything has a purpose, but also, it can be easily…

“A purpose is why something exists.” Dude...let me try to explain this to you slowly...things in nature don’t exist so we can use them. They just exist.

Like, you keep repeating shit you don’t even *realize* you’ve never examined at all.

Maybe if you thought past 3rd grade you might figure this out, instead of shoving…