Now you have changed the question along with a transparent deflection. For the original query, it's not even close.

Beer snobs pop up where you least expect them.

Doubling down, are you?

If you're name is Donald Trump Jr. (or , Jr., depending on your house style), you can logically be referred to as Donald Jr., but your last name is not Trump Jr.; it is Trump. This goes for all the stupid "Jr.s" and "IIIs" you now see on the backs of football jerseys.

Like I was saying ...

Just overall incompetence for a supposedly big game. How do stationary refs staring at the line miss such a call?

Except he had control when he came to rest. You can bobble it and do somersaults all you want as long as you control it in the end.

You were watching a different play.

Beer snobs never disappoint.

You're not supposed to bitch about the calls, but that one inexcusable bad call—owing to a bad rule, basically—made a huge difference in the game.

How about the multiple times he overthrew or missed open receivers—and most not because of pressure?

Actually, I think CR’s reliability ratings are their weakest feature, since they rely on voluntary responses to surveys. But they do spot outliers of good and bad reliability. And their actual reviews of cars are objective and useful.

Yeah, but the ones you describe for CR are worlds less problematic than those of all the others. CR is the only source that doesn't have an incentive to give favorable reports to as many models and manufacturers as possible.

And in my experience, the dealership is not actually making the loan; it is arranging it. Last two loans I got through dealerships (at competitive interest) were handled by banks, and had no early payoff fee.

You should not even include Consumer Reports with a mention of the other magazines, and reviewers and rating operations like Power. Only CR is fully independent and has no financial incentive to please manufacturers. Consumer's Digest is a scam—a pretend CR that basically sells favorable or at least soft reviews. The…

Of course, underemployed actors have never driven cabs to scrape up funds.

Commonly, too, they lease the cab, pay for their gas, and keep what they collect, whether from the meter or tips. They often have to work 12 hour days to make any money.

Uber haters have no clue that this is the case, and that when they defend the traditional cab system, they are defending the millionaire medallion owners who for years got rich exploiting drivers with their government-created monopoly structure.

This person doesn’t understand Uber. Her sister may have made the vague complaint that “the only money I make is on tips,” but since almost nobody tips on Uber—because no-tipping is part of Uber’s declared pricing and pay structure—obviously the many people who continue to drive for Uber are making some kind of money…

It is not untrue.