Yes, but interestingly enough, not a graduate of any of the universities he wants to change these rules for. Or any university at all.

What amount of time are you obligated to wait before throwing away a Christmas/birthday/thank-you/graduation card?

BLACK RAGE!

-12°F just last Wednesday. Go outside. Pop open door, reach a foot in to push in clutch, start car, move it to neutral. Turn on defrosters and heat. Brush/scrape off car. Get in and drive.

Darren Wilson didn't know Mike Brown was a robbery suspect so no....that doesn't explain exactly why he got shot. http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/15/us/…

6 is also a fitting number for this shirt, since that's how many times Darren Wilson shot an unarmed black kid.

I'm a Cardinals fan and I wouldn't be caught dead in that shirt. Mostly because I'm white.

Ya know, back when I was in school, you tended to call the parents of the child when they were uncooperative. But, sure. The police is such a better option!

I did and it does not change my opinion one iota. Her father was texting her about her mother. And a person does not have to be literally DYING for a child to be worried or concerned. Or do you only give two shits if someone is on life support?

Abuse is often chronic. And his response to hitting her was not a horrified "Oh no!I've lost my temper and don't know what to do! Let me check her pulse and her vitals and cradle her in my arms like she is precious and not drag her like she is evidence I am trying to get rid of." This may be the first time. But I…

I think his "non-alarm" after knocking her out cold, dragging her lifeless body then dropping to the floor, nudging her with his foot says this is not the first time.

No evidence other than the fact that the vast majority of this kind of abuse is chronic. Yes, that's circumstantial, but it's also statistical. But, if you are going to take character references from the third string right guard as "evidence" in this, then you certainly should also take the overwhelming nature of…

The "we don't know that it happened more than once" is a dumb fuck argument. What kind of decent human being gets so enraged by the person he loves who is clearly trying to maintain her distance and de-escalate the situation that he PUNCHES HER TWICE IN THE HEAD, CASUALLY OBSERVES HER UNCONSCIOUS BODY AND THEN DRAGS…

Oh, hey, everyone who *has never been in a romantic relationship with him* think he's definitely a great guy who'd never do such a thing! Everyone can just tell an abuser by looking at them, so it was totally an isolated incident!

No, it's where he argues that society has the right to decide that behaviors should be punished even if the victim doesn't agree. He spelled it out for you right there:

negative 4 months.

Most victims of domestic abuse stay with there abuser. So everyone needs to back off the "she's doing it for the money.".

Well that's just a whole bunch of sad right there. Sad because she thinks it's a ratings ploy, sad that she defends her husband, sad that it reminds me that even after everything that went down she made that man her husband, sad that it took the second video for this punishment to come down when the first was horrific…

I don't think it contradicts it at all. Some NFL employees could have seen the tape on the casino's own monitors, reported back, and the higher ups decided they'd rather have plausible deniability than request their own copy.