I think they would have been smarter to find a plaintiff to bring this suit, rather than CREW. For example, they could have found a competitor (such as a DC hotel) that was actually injured by the alleged Emoluments Clause violations. I wonder if that is why they have the third party injury portion of the complaint—…

I was concerned about standing, but the complaint appears to be drafted in a manner to address the Lujan standard. Not saying it is a winner of an argument, but the allegations and arguments were much more plausible than I thought it would be.

Actually, I believe there were at least six bankruptcies.

At least there are outsiders willing to hold his feet to the fire. This was just filed today (big names in the con law world were associated with the complaint, like Chemerinsky, Tribe, Painter, and Eisen). http://s3.amazonaws.com/storage.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/23140054/CREW-DJT-Final.pdf

I heard that Fox fired George Will, and instead hired Nigel Farage. These are very strange times we’re living in.

And this is why Rudy Nosferatu Giuliani is a failed politician and probably couldn’t even be elected dog catcher. Thanks for your irrelevant opinion, Nosferatu.

Looks like Steve bannon

The Salt Lake Tribune did a poll of Utahans (sp?), and it found that 65% of respondents wanted Chaffetz to investigate Trump. I guess party loyalty is more important than constituent concerns.

I would hope McMullin runs. I don’t agree with him on many issues, but at least he has integrity. The same cannot be said for Jason Chaffetz.

I think he’s upset that he’s not allowed to look his daughter in the eyes anymore, given that he voted for Trump.

This is completely off topic, but this deserves attention and scorn. I am donating to his opponents, including any GOP primary challengers

Probably yes. The parade route was apparently a ghost town

The people who are smashing windows are playing right into Trump’s tiny hands.

You just copy and paste the URL into your comment.

Three posts later you offer no substantive response, and still miss the point. Had you bothered reading the Politico article (which it’s clear you didn’t), you would have understood the point. Critical thinking and reading comprehension clearly aren’t your strengths.  

Many people are saying...

I see you’re a troll and can only communicate in memes. Welcome! I look forward to seeing you get raked over the coals in the comment section. Speaking of coal, I guess you’re also dumb enough to believe that Trump will bring those jobs back....it’s a moribund industry for reasons that go far beyond environmental…

Oh, he definitely will because he’s a deeply insecure man with tiny hands. But deep down he knows the crowds, like his hands, are small.

Again, this is more about the perception of Trump and how he believes that others view him as illegitimate. That is a big point made by the individuals quoted in the Politico article.

Clearly not, nor did this person bother reading the article I posted. This has more to do with Trump’s thought process and insecurities rather than the actual issue whether he is legitimate.