Agreed. I was necessarily agreeing with marsh 100%, ‘cuz I hate that two tablet layout, and the vents...just saying what I thought he/she meant. I would certainly take either option if they fell out of the sky on me.
Agreed. I was necessarily agreeing with marsh 100%, ‘cuz I hate that two tablet layout, and the vents...just saying what I thought he/she meant. I would certainly take either option if they fell out of the sky on me.
I don’t think it marshknute was comparing them directly, just that MB’s interior design was more distinct/classy/droolproof.
I guess you are choosing to repeatedly ignore “not the usual suspects”. And the $10K was “maybe up to”, “sub-$7K” was preferred. Two strikes.
Well, the Buzzfeed headline effect is strong in this one...no one would have clicked if it had just read “Called inside fastball goes a little more inside as intended...or was it?”
I stand corrected. My people will be issuing a poorly thought-out apology to Greater Pep Boys Admiration Club immediately.
As obnoxiously gaudy as that decorating is, it pales in comparison to the steaming pile of shit customization job that was done to this car. And by customization, I mean “talentless hack got a hold of the PepBoys catalog and ran across a clearance sale at an upholstery shop”.
Hello, Comrade!!! Could I interest you in some fresh, piping hot borscht???
My ex was German. I jokingly once asked her what Germany’s national sport was, expecting to hear “duh, football”, but instead she looked me dead in the eye and said, “Invading France...it’s been 60 years, they should be nervous”.
Good points, and some I don’t disagree with....but it was also no secret whatsoever that his platform also had trimming the government bureaucracy fat (so to speak) as a key plank. Just because a politician’s platform is job creation, doesn’t mean that no jobs ever are going to be lost, it’s not black and white. If a…
I’m sure they will be 100% successful in their efforts, as China always follows regulations to the T.
Oh, I have no doubt that some percentage of those 3,200 are redundant/ineffective/useless middle-level bureaucrats whose absence will affect the efficiency of the EPA not one bit, just like any large organization.
I don’t think that’s the OP’s point. He’s merely pointing out the Terrell stated he would attempt to keep any/his biases out of his writing, and every article basically comes down to “Yuck yuck guess what that idiot Orange Cheeto did now??”, filled with some Wikipedia-level analysis. Whether the Orange Cheeto is…
So much for an honest and open discussion, right??