Nah, Rihanna can do better.

Sean Penn’s recent attempt at journalism ...

Probably to cover up rape allegations.

Much has changed in public perception and politicians focus. Not much has changed with the actual firearms. I support him articulating his position though as being a senator or representative is different than being president. And it’s important to explain why he may support some laws he previously did and not others…

I think a huge difference is openness. Sanders says his views on gun control are clearly formed based on his representation of Vermont hunters, but that they need revising on the national scale. Obviously he his adjusting his position based on national polling, but he’s honest about that. Clinton, on the other hand,…

I think the key word there is always. The people I know who take issue with Hillary Clinton’s opinion changing take issue with the frequency to which she does it. Throughout her political tenure she has changed her opinion on pretty much every major issue while Bernie has changed his on one, and even then it’s not a…

I have no problem with him changing his position—-a lot of things have changed in this country since 2005 with regard to guns and gun ownership, so I actually appreciate him understanding that and revising his position to fit what is going on now.

No need to even go to Keystone. Clinton’s changed HER mind on guns since 2008, when she was to the right of Obama and waxing on about going hunting with grandpappy.

I think Bernie’s stance on guns fits the middleground opinion of Americans: Even Republicans want sensible gun laws. The NRA holds everyone hostage. Their rhetoric—their ability to keep firearms less regulated than fireworks—stands in the face of the 80+% of Americans who understand that reasonable regulation can and…

“cite a politician’s response to public opinion as a flaw.”

Literally is supposed to be THEIR JOB, representing the PEOPLE, *not* the lobbyist corporate donors.

It only makes sense for a politician who has represented the constituents of one state to refine his policy platform as it relates to the nation at large.

Vermont is a huge hunting state, so it makes sense that he supports gun owners to an extent, and didn’t vote yes on that piece of legislation. He is one of those people who can see the difference between having a rifle for hunting birds, and having an assault weapon to massacre trees in a forest and blow animals to…

Yeah, much like pretty much all coverage not online is devoted to Hillary, as well.

Some may bray with the “flip flop” trope - personally, I WANT a candidate with the courage and mental capacity to refine and revise legislation, unlike the ubiquitous adherents to dogma.

As a teenager I loved it but by the time I hit my twenties I realized what a shitty friend Carrie was; always ditching her friends to meet up with Big or some other annoying guy. And she was so embarrassingly bad with money for someone in their 30's that it was actually offensive.

I mean it’s about as unique as every other place.

Taxation would go up but overall cost per capita would be drastically reduced.