Truly. I hope if she has any interest in writing as a profession, she is encouraged by the overwhelmingly positive response to her statement and pursues it. As it stands, she’s already written something that I hope becomes a part of the American canon.

That’s because men aren’t promiscuous, they’re good at getting ass.

Hook up/party culture and sexual promiscuity are the shit head dog whistle for “she was a slut and she wanted it. I didn’t do anything wrong.”

Her comment on why she chose to remain anonymous is beautiful and lends even more power to her statement.

It’s also post game. I understand hiding your strategy before you’ve played, but after? The reporters and opposing coaches were watching the actual game, this isn’t a spoiler alert situation.

He stood up furious, surveyed the state of the girl behind him, and just shook his head and left. Came back wearing a brand new jersey from the team store.

This wasn’t on me but it was an observed vomiting:

No but it references the same thing — an inexplicably awesome children’s toy from the 80s.

Depressingly, there are a lot of news stories we can still link to to refute that one when it’s pulled out.

I would assume if the court rules that she can’t be kept at the “camp,” she would have grounds for emancipation from her parents. Hopefully they raise enough money that she can be set up sans asshole parents for a bit.

This is a nice punctuation mark on a conversation I had this morning with someone who said that people should stop talking about LGB rights because “they can get married what else do they want.”

I’m well aware of that. The first question was if it was prescribed. If it was not, my question was whether they pursue criminal cases when they have clear evidence that someone is taking drugs illegally

I bet he was wearing one. If he hadn’t been, I doubt he would have still been standing.

Ah OK, thanks. That answers that.

Thanks — that info answered my first comment and pretty much shut the whole line of thinking down.

OK Well those details are entirely relevant and make it sound like there was never a legitimate reason for the prescription in the first place. Thanks.

Is this not a drug that has a purpose in being taken right before competition (if you have a condition and it does increase flow)?

I’m aware, I’m one of them — but when those people are caught, they can be brought up on charges. I’m asking if she was getting it legally.

First of all, tone down — I don’t care at all about Sharapova, I’m just curious about where the boundaries are when a drug that does have a legitimate reason for being prescribed but is also performance enhancing.

How was she getting it if she had no prescription? If she was taking them illegally, will this be a criminal case?