...and that’s all you’ve got, really. “They’re not popular enough right now.”

Yes. He’s on death row solely for the murders of three cops. He was never charged with those other things; we don’t have to ignore them because the prosecutors already did! ...how do you think the law works in the US?

And he can magically make it constitutional? You keep ignoring that point. 

Obsession isn’t magically better because it’s pointed at someone else.

Woods got the death penalty for four counts of capital murder in an event where three people were killed and he never so much as held the weapon used. He wasn’t convicted of ‘being an accomplice’ because he didn’t take the plea deal, which would have allowed that, on bad advice from his lawyer, who then abandoned him.

...Yes, none of what you say there is false. It’s also myopic as all hell - what constitutional authority do you suppose national adoption would be predicated on?

But you know me, I’m obsessed with race.

3) ...because they don’t come with the disqualifications the others do.

I don’t know if you’re taking questions or have the time, but how do you feel - personally and professionally - about the gap between how black history is produced for a US audience and an international audience? (Or, the difference in how “First Black ___” sounds here and elsewhere.)

A) Shipping is less expensive than you’d think, internationally.

Some men just live to hate.

Big McLargehuge retired recently. Wants to play a safer sport now, like rugby.

Pretty sure RM’s just screwing around for the camera there.

I wish they hadn’t. Anthropomorphizing my spice rack is going to be harder without it.

You know there’s salt-free Mrs. Dash?

It’s never been clear to me how exactly that would be enforceable, as a legal matter as well as in person. If anything, that would be the fastest way to start a sustained attempt to get Terry v. Ohio overturned, or at least altered to require probable cause.

Yeah, we’ve thought about getting a new priest. Our current one just isn’t keeping her body in her grave as well as he used to.

No, no, “can’t say I’m not interested...” Double negative, not single.

...again, still a step up. (And who would be enforcing the stopping and frisking on a national level? The FBI?)

Maybe. But the jury thought the consequences were life in prison. The judge, and possibly no one else, thought otherwise. That ‘consequences’ argument only ever holds as much water as the belief in the system (and not merely the law) as the person making it.