I feel like the moral barometer might be different for most folks than it is for someone who thought hooking up with R. Kelly was a good idea a year ago.
I worked at Neiman Marcus on Michigan Avenue about ten years ago, and R. Kelly always brought young girls in to have their makeup done by a specific makeup artist, because she loved bragging about having R.Kelly as a “client” and didn’t ask questions. It’s heartbreaking and infuriating that he’s been exploiting young…
Hearing this reminds me a lot of the You Must Remember This series about Charles Manson. The host makes a point that, until the murders, the behavior of Manson - being surrounded by women who obeyed his every command was, or was very close to the type of behavior that was celebrated by the misogynistic hippie music…
“I think these things have to be proven. This is a very strange and unbeknownst allegation to us and there would be no way I could comment on it. It’s irrelevant. We don’t know who you’re talking about. This is just an allegation.”
I definitely hope so because his is easily the best celebrity talk show ever.
How is Gram Norton under £1,000,000?
I didn’t feel like his response was shitty; he makes his point clearly and without much fuss, and he’s definitely playing back until the dude gets personal.
“I only threaten people with real-world violence at certain predetermined times which are not made clear to the subject of my threat” is not a good argument. I don’t see a reasonable distinction between in-character and out-of-character when it spreads to threatening people on Twitter.
They want team kills to happen. They don’t want people to intentionally team kill strangers. Seems pretty simple.
It was also posted on the /r/pubattlegrounds, which PlayerUnknown and the rest of the dev team view.
> He should have ONLY gotten the ban if his teammates actually reported him. Friends do stupid stuff all the time in multiplayer games.
The possibility that you could kill a friendly player is allowed.
He’s a popular PUBG streamer. Known for being a dickhead.
Dr. Disrespect later threatened to kick PlayerUnknown’s various body parts, provoking PlayerUnknown to divulge a few personal views on violence, which, surprisingly for a third-person shooter developer, lean more toward pacifism:
One is violence in a video game.
Which is why they specify “non-accidental.” They want you to be able to team kill, but only because you screwed up.
I’m having trouble finding much sympathy here. Dr. Disrespect went against the rules. Irrespective of what he thinks of those rules, he’s subject to them. Besides that, team-killing is a waste. The player without a vehicle may still be able to do things or link up with the team. Even if he’s almost dead, the game will…
> Guy threatens violence on Developer.
You paid someone $20,000 to steal a dog but then you claim it’s someone else’s fault the dog got stolen?