And even Koenigsegg is impressed with what Tesla is doing.

Hybrids operate pretty different from EVs just an fyi.

While I would like to see that, so far based on what they put out on paper is still behind Tesla is both range and acceleration.

You do realize Tesla does make a healthy gross profit right? They just reinvest that profit into rapid growth. But I like how you try to spin a company growing rapidly as a bad thing lol

That is just you being bitter and jealous.

You mean properly designed to cheat on emissions? Or properly designed GT3s that caught on fire and had to be recalled? You are saying that was intentional?

You mean like they delivered the whole cheating on emissions thing right?

That is like saying a car is a full motorcycle since it also has 2 wheels.

First of all, The Tesla Model S is a full sized sedan. The Mission E seems like a far smaller car. Probably will be more of a competitor to the Roadster 2. That said they specs they propose in 2020 is already less range and less 0-60 performance than Tesla has now, let alone by then.

Was there a piece of mirror? All there is is a piece of the hubcap and the tail lights. So he could have crashed from the back side and the driver wouldn’t notice other than the sound of the crash.

Assuming he actually knew about the hit, It is possible the motorcycle collided with the rear of the car as he was turning in the middle of the night. The guy in the car may have heard a sound of boom in the back of the car. But did not bother to check what it was.

They can advocate all they want. It doesn’t matter. What matters is looking at each law at an individual basis.

It does not matter what the end result some people want, just because some people want complete bans does not mean there can’t be a compromise on things that everyone agrees on.

Except 1 big issue that you are ignoring. The NRA back in the day used to be an organization that taught people how to properly use their guns and safely. They also favored sensible gun control. The NRA then got hijacked by the gun manufacturers who changed the focus of the NRA from sensible to insensible for the sake…

The point of a bi-partisan panel is so that there won’t be any claims of tampering by the other side. (because they then would have to insult their constituents).

The CDC looks for methods of prevention. On top of that if the study is done by a bipartison panel it will make it easier to pass sensible laws. You have to understand that part of this entire debate is always the defense of “sure guns kill people but there is no evidence that limiting them will end up with less…

You have it all wrong, that assault weapon is for her children to use. They grab it and as she runs the children shoot back.

That would be just fine for most people. The reason is because without the lobby money and influence, the thought is common sense will prevail.

That is just public donations due to limits. There is also other things in play here such as connections, influence, super pack funding. The NRA has run many successful campaigns at removing politicians who did not fall in line. Their tactic is mostly scare tactics.

Can I get a car to match my pants?