Well I think disabling regenerative braking would be a start (a mistake a lot of people make is keeping it on). But it also depends on what kind of track they plan to do.

Depends on what you consider a legitimate track. For example, is any track it completed automatically not legitimate?

Based on testing it is 85-86% efficiency, not 75% as you claim:

Yes, if not for regulations, she would have had more guns to defend herself and have a shoot out with her 4 year old son to protect him.

There might be bias in those who wrote the report, but excluding options in the key that are never used is a common practice and does not reflect that bias. This isn’t the same case a survey where good is the lowest option because other options are statistically relevant, in this case options that are not utilized are…

The doors have a 2 hinge system that allows the doors to open in small garages with low ceilings. What stopped it here was detection of a human.

It is not just detecting physical contact, it is also detecting his presence. He put his hand on top of the car doors, so the sensors see that as an object (a moving object in specific, thus a human) and stop.

Disgruntled employee?

Cars have feelings too!

At first I thought it was Darwinism. But at one point you just realize stupid can’t kill itself fast enough. : /

The amount batteries lose on their own is not that much, in the case of Tesla it may be a bit more but mostly because it powers all the electronics. That said, it wouldn’t be enough to make such a huge difference.

What is biased about the scale when an average new car has about 25mpg? The scale seems on point considering the data options. If any scored below 25mpg it would get “bad, terrible, worst” on the scale too.

Except there are no objective facts since no one can seem to legally replicate 444wh/km outside of a race track going over 100mph.

So you are saying what other governments are going to do is stop teaching people math so they fail basic math and put out unrealistic figures?

The answer is no, actually electricity prices may drop. The reasoning is right now most power consumption happens during peak hours. During offpeak hours we have a lot of generation that goes underutilized. In many places it is so bad that utilities are literally willing to give away electricity for free +…

Under the NEDC in Europe, 85kwh RWD Tesla Model S gets 170wh/km. Under Australia’s testing it gets 181wh/km. Under US EPA testing it gets 236wh/km.

Actually, that isn’t bullshit. That is a flaw in how NEDC fuel economy test is. Under NEDC a pure electric car has infinite mpg. And plugin hybrids easily get over 200mpg.

So what you are saying again confirms my suspicions that to you a Venron engine is no different than one on a Toyota Camry right?

One hinge and 2 hinges make a HUGE difference. Because it fixes the biggest issues of Gullwing doors. And makes it go further by making them more practical than regular doors. With use of…

We know FAR more than that about the Model 3. 200+ miles range will be the base option with more options coming. There will be a performance model, there will not be a signature model. Next generation motor. And that is only a few of the things we already know that was left out : /

Those are not gullwing doors though, they are Falcon Wing doors (2 hinge instead of 1). Name me any other car that had Falcon wing doors?