Really?
Really?
Unfortunately, your attitude seems to be a rarity around here.
So domestic abuse and genital mutilation are funny now?
Why should there be a differentiation? If you cheat, you're a cheater. It seems like you're trying to justify why some people do it. That's bullshit.
So he's got a passion for something and instead of encouraing that passion, because you don't like it, you want to undermine it? I don't think he really comes out worse in this scenario.
I really don't get the push for Warren to run and I don't see her doing so, ever. To her credit. I think a Presdiental run would tarnish her, even if she were to win.
This is great. Consdering wed like to see an increase in the number of female Senators, not a decrease, it's good to have a very capable contender in Harris. I think the other strongest contender may have been Ellen Tauscher.
Yeah, but much of the Berman-Sherman contest was just Sherman being a dick-wad. Berman was actually a pleasant person to be around. Sherman, not so much. Was sorry to see how that turned out.
Ugh, even an article that's positive o marriage still manages to make it daunting and depressing
I want to offer the comment a billion stars. I grew up in LA and didn't discover Diddy Reise until senior year of high school. My reaction:
Well, she's a white woman so, why would she be sentenced to something comparable to everyone else?
Agree with all of that.
Sorry, wasn't referring to the paper, the Jez article. Particularly the headline. Yes I know, clickbait and all, but if it's for clickbait, that suggests they aren't intersted in taking the matter seriously.
Terrorism is a real threat, as the last few days have shown. But there are plenty of folks that would exaggerate that threat, and the percentage of people from a certain relgion who would carry it out, for shock value. They point to plenty of studies on such attitudes to back their claims (like the oft cited 10% of…
That's tautological and I don't know what your point is.
I was looking for that as well.
The fact that anyone would serilusly answer the question that way is really frightening. Are these admitted sociopaths, or did they just not take the study seriously. I'm honestly not sure which is the more likely explanation but I would not be surprised if it was a mix of both.
I wouldn't go so far as not to be allowed to publish. Crap studies happen all the time, and critiquing their methodology can be helpful in figuring out how to do things right. The problem, as I see it, is when you have situations like this when a very tentative conclusion is presented, as in the headline, as…
No question that a lack of understanding of what constitutes rapes contributes, probably significantly, to the rape problem.
Notice that point is completely ignored in the article. That seems to me to be a methological defect in the study itself. How does such admission compare to other crimes that people might say, in a study, they would commit without consequences.