waruz
Warruz
waruz

Feel like Crunchyroll is slacking this season, seems most of what I want to watch is else where.

Out of curiosity, when you pick a dash button for something that has multiple different choices or variety, how does it pick between them? I assume you set them up before hand or do you not have a choice at all etc?

Out of curiosity, when you pick a dash button for something that has multiple different choices or variety, how does

As I mentioned, “One can’t tell if the decision to change something in this case is self-censorship or the NUMEROUS other reasons that could exists” which is why I also say, “If you want to disagree with a design in a game, that’s your prerogative , but to claim its something like self-censorship without proof is just

Self-censorship, generally, is a term that likes to get tossed around to demonize ANY change someone disagrees with. The main problem with self-censorship, is that its impossible to prove without either being the creator or being told by the creator as self-censorship is a comment on the intent behind said change.

You misinterpret their mocking, its not towards the article, its towards the future comments section.

I would say people are aware of said issues, most don’t exactly have a true understanding of them, I would put myself in that category.

Its irrelevant that the issue came about before Pokemon Go, the time of the issues start does not bind its discussion and relating to that discussion to that time frame.

That chart simply shows arrests, not convictions. Arrests do not prove someone committed a crime, hell, convictions don’t either (but we accept that with a margin of error), which is kind of my point. For which we judge someone as committing a crime is an inherently flawed system for various reasons, so again, how

I mean, you are more then welcome to explain how one can tell apart censorship and artistic freedom in a non-complete product.

To play devil’s advocate, how can you reliably prove that?

Sensationalism is a blurry line with loads of gray in the middle. I would hardly call bringing the attention of an existing issue through a new phenomenon sensationalism . Pokemon Go is just being used as a platform to bring up the discussion and issue in another light.

There are TONS of apps and games that murder your battery. Perhaps the top example I can think of in terms of apps is any Doppler or Storm Tracker apps that constantly check the radar, they murder your battery because they sit in the background continually checking up to see whats happening. Hell, even twitter can be

I agree its a multi-pronged approach, but when thinking of phones its basically been a “never catch up” scenario. Again, this is not a bad thing, but it means that the efficiency that is gained is instantly being used for the smaller form factor and increased specs, resulting in battery usage remaining largely the

Own a Wii U, never played Splatoon, Phone battery life has been an issue since smart phones, play other intensive games and watch your battery become devoured.

Im not going to pretend to know how Pokemon Go renders or that there isn’t improvements to be made, but I imagine a large part of the drain is simply you have to have XYZ running as well for the whole system to function properly. And simply put, Phones are continually designed for “looks” rather than function, more

This highlights the issues of current phones more then the game.

Purfect Politics...

Its essentially a left over Stat from previous Dark Souls games that at somepoint was deemed too powerful, most likely due to the general increase in speed from previous entries. Instead of getting rid of it, they gave it a much smaller purpose, when it most likely would of been better for it not to exist.

Funny enough, this shows how ones own culture affects this discussion, one that is essentially about cultural norms. “Censorship is bad” is a very American cultural belief(although its culturally acceptable for minors), this is not to say its unwarranted, or that it is wrong or right, but in a discussion about

Of course the why matters, if you wish to speak of being intellectually dishonest, then ignoring “the why” would be just that. As shown in your posts, there are multiple assumptions you are making with your example that do a disservice to the complex discussion at hand, and yes, reasoning is important, in fact its