warrior-voltus
warrior-voltus
warrior-voltus

Whats an IE?

Its a bit unfair to claim that Apple is notorious for downplaying real issues. The rest of the competition does not get anywhere close to the level of scrutiny Apple’s product are subject to with every release. I remember when the same Galaxy S3 device was being shipped with half the RAM and completely different

People have issues figuring out 7*8=56 but we really expect 10 random people to be able to keep up with a moving sequence of odd and even numbers.

That was my initial thought, but no it doesnt work. If the first guy says he sees a black hat in front of him then the next person is forced to use his turn call his own hat. Basically the second one inline doesn’t get a chance to tell the person in front him what color their hat is, at this point everything goes to

Its tricky, we really have to fight against our natural instincts to stay the fuck away from that that is dangerous. Humans evolved in an environment where making the wrong judgement between what is dangerous and what isn’t (based on very little evidence) set the line between being eating by a predator or surviving.

I thought the article already cited evidence that isolating these sex offender only increases their chances of re-offense. They should serve their time in prison as dictated by the law, but, by the time their out we need programs in place to re-integrate them into society or else they will fuck it up again.

I think the point of the article is too decoupled from the reality behind brand loyalty when it comes to ecosystems. While this might be true for things like clothing, appliances and even TV’s, this critique does not quite extend the same way when it comes to electronic products that are tight to ecosystems driven by

lol i love u

Well bud, if u scroll pass the article thats trying to tell you whats new, u’ll never find out whats new.

That’s a lot of money...it’ll be just a matter of time. Hacking feasibility is directly proportional to the amount of money involved for the exploit.

“better world is one where capitalism is destroyed and those who are saving us live in vast mansions with great wealth.”

So easy to talk shit eh.

PASS

The argument really isnt that hard to understand. Getting rid of outdated technology that already has a better replacement alternative, forces people to adapt faster and helps devices advance faster. Its not about making old tech disappear or not, its about how fast you can make that happen. When  introduced a

If that were true at all then most people would own a surface. That is not the case, so what you are saying is incorrect.

The metric is definitely not you. The fact that you are satisfied with it really doesnt matter. Truth is most consumers and developers rejected the surface regardless of Microsoft’s efforts. Im simply explaining the many reasons that contributed to its failure.

Read my reply bellow where i explained what i meant by mediocre

...

1 & 2 Maybe I should have explained what i meant by mediocre. Mediocre in the sense that it is a device too heavy and unpractical to be a good tablet yet too small, too limited and with too clunky of a ui to be a good laptop.

The reason why people did not care about the Surface Pro is the same reason most people do not care about a netbook with a touchscreen. You are trying to merge two devices into one: A mediocre laptop, and a mediocre tablet for the price of a high-end laptop. Along with this failed concept you have the issue of having